Profile of Katitof

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/katitof


Thread: Nerf su-76 barrage3 Nov 2015, 22:11 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Nov 2015, 22:10 PMWingZero I think the problem is T4 is too costly, that is why you see allot of Su-76s. It isn't. It simply offers NOTHING worth the investment unless you've went for 34/85 and katy mix. In: Lobby
Thread: Nerf su-76 barrage3 Nov 2015, 22:08 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Nov 2015, 22:04 PMVuther Everything is in a sufficiently large quantity But it doesn't equal to said unit being OP. Nothing will stop three KTs in 2v2 game, that doesn't mean KT should be nerfed. And if you allowed to get that critical mass, especially with vehicles, you've lost way before that moment already. In: Lobby
Thread: Remove ML-20 from the game 3 Nov 2015, 17:33 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Nov 2015, 17:14 PMCardboard Tank Why? They are both 600mp units. They should be equal in cost efficiency but different. 105 firing faster, ML-20 doing more damage. Don't know, why PaK40 is better then ZiS-3 for the same cost? Why grens are better then cons? Why pwerfer is better then katy(this will get hot ) Why ost sniper is better then sov sniper? Why mortar is? Why ost mht is better then us mht? The list goes on and on for same role, same cost units of old armies. The only problem I see with the ML-20 is the Recon + Dive bomb combination. A first start (at least for 1v1) would be to take away either the recon or dive bomb from the Elefant and CAS doctrine respectively. The problem isn't as much stuka+reckon, but these two being in meta doctrines while ML-20 is pretty hipster stuff. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Nerf su-76 barrage3 Nov 2015, 17:30 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Nov 2015, 16:34 PMelchino7 It should had -20pen across the board and it would be fine. It been a replacement to the Su85 is a matter of T4 been a tad expensive for the performance of the units. That says more about the state of T4 tbh. In: Lobby
Thread: Panzer 4 penetration.3 Nov 2015, 17:29 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Nov 2015, 17:11 PMRMMLz Actually, that's something I want to see for all mediums, mostly T34/76. Like getting 34/76 to vet3 possible is in other circumstances then sinking tiger crossing the ice In: Lobby
Thread: Remove ML-20 from the game 3 Nov 2015, 15:06 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Nov 2015, 14:48 PMAchtAchter When was that stated? Back then pquemsieh said shocks in m3 counter pio spam? Pretty much. Additional hilarity was in the fact that in the same thread people discussed reckon+stuka in the ele doc vs arty as well In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Whermacht inf squad size3 Nov 2015, 13:36 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Nov 2015, 13:26 PMAirborne Panzer grens cost 360 manpower Pgrens are 340 for a loooong time now. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Whermacht inf squad size3 Nov 2015, 13:01 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Nov 2015, 12:51 PMdasheepeh So you want to tell me that Axis infantry is supposed to just stand there in front of MG's. While allied inf runs across the map, takes away your 20% and basepins you because you cant contest them. Or you could do what works for wehr since vcoh In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Panzer 4 penetration.3 Nov 2015, 12:05 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Nov 2015, 10:57 AMDiomedes Reducing cost could make it more viable choice. HP > Armor Penetration and Armor worth less at close range. So use the tank at longer range, when it have the most advantages? In: Lobby
Thread: Panzer 4 penetration.3 Nov 2015, 10:38 AM Jump back to quoted post3 Nov 2015, 10:36 AMNuclear Arbitor the only mediums that are effective against heavies are the V and the comet. you can still beat heavies with IVs/cromwells/3476s/shermans but it requires multiple tanks and good micro in decent terrain. that's how it should be. EZ-8 and 34/85 also are valid choices, not as good as these two, but still potent, especially EZ8 which is simply superior medium tank. In: Lobby