Profile of Blackart

Jump back to quoted post3 Apr 2015, 22:21 PMAlexzandvar

That's okay, but it's cost would need to be raised. The PIV is 25 fuel more expensive because it's a better tank.

Jump back to quoted post9 Apr 2015, 21:08 PMbraciszek

T3 and T4 have retarded unit placement. T4 is support with katyusha rocket artillery and the su-85 tank destroyer. Then some bozo decides to shove the attempt at a jack of all trades su-seventyshit-m spg. Minus the AT capability and infantry support the actual tank had. DOES NOT BELONG

I still object that the t-70 and t34 are in the same tier, as the t34 undermines the t-70 (imo, since the t-70 would be seen much more often if it was in T4 as it is the elite infantry model sniper) by costing not much more.

I envision a t-70 guarding the katyusha and su-85 while the su-76m would be the ranged AT for the T34/76 as well as bonus artillery support but

HURR RELIC DESIGN T3 OR T4 (AKA use callins and screw that noise)

It seems to take years to do obvious, simple positive changes that only require a UI change... But new content and more bugs are more important.

Jump back to quoted post5 Apr 2015, 14:29 PMATCF

Axis are cooler since they had to fight against the unlimited spam the Allies threw at them ( by being outnumbered in most battles )