Profile of VonIvan

Avatar Area

Offline United States
Posts: 2487 | Subs: 21

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/VonIvan
Twitter: https://twitter.com/EXPERTSVonIvan
Steam: 76561198012811763
Residence:

United States
Nationality:

United States
Game Name: EXPERTSVonIvan

Show Latest Posts


Thread: Ostheer Dedicated "TD" need 60 Range as Others24 Jun 2015, 20:57 PM Jump back to quoted post24 Jun 2015, 20:53 PMAlexzandvar The Ost Panther is very, very cost ineffective due to how much teching costs on top of 175 fuel. The OKW Panther however, IS cost effective. I don't buy MG's on Ost Panthers because I almost never have games that last long enough for me to justify the purchase of one. It's cost effective in 2v2 and above. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: COH2.ORG Faceplate & Decal Pack Launched24 Jun 2015, 02:54 AM Jump back to quoted post24 Jun 2015, 02:53 AMJanne252 Apparently customs only. That's so lame. In: News
Thread: COH2.ORG Faceplate & Decal Pack Launched24 Jun 2015, 02:51 AM So........does it work in automatch or customs only? In: News
Thread: Patch notes for 23rd June23 Jun 2015, 21:13 PM RELEASE THE PATCH. In: Lobby
Thread: Relic: June 23rd Update: About Balance23 Jun 2015, 19:30 PM Jump back to quoted post23 Jun 2015, 18:33 PMaaa you are posting so much angry posts but I cant understand what you want in short In: Lobby
Thread: 10 Reasons Why We Need Observer Mode Now23 Jun 2015, 17:31 PM ILLUMANTI In: News
Thread: Relic: June 23rd Update: About Balance23 Jun 2015, 17:19 PM Jump back to quoted post23 Jun 2015, 16:46 PMKatitof I think osttruppen are better then irregulars, no contest. They have defensive scaling so high that it gives them normal con squad durability later on. Irregulars on the other hand... there is no redeeming quality going for them... Why they cost so much while sucking so hard is beyond my comprehension. I've played with osttruppen and had some success and fun. The only game I've won using irregulars was against some pro, who was so sophisticated that his opening BO was T2 and 4 mortars. Sure vs your average randumb Ostruppen are okay. Try it vs the Top 500. And you'll find they give you a loss quicker than trying to tech to t4 units. In: Lobby
Thread: Relic: June 23rd Update: About Balance23 Jun 2015, 15:31 PM Jump back to quoted post23 Jun 2015, 15:23 PMKatitof Hey! Osttruppen are actually quite decent now! If only all other cheap doctrinal units were as effective. Not as effective as Irregulars In: Lobby
Thread: Relic: June 23rd Update: About Balance23 Jun 2015, 14:20 PM Jump back to quoted post23 Jun 2015, 14:09 PMdbmb Relic doesn't understand that releasing out-of-context patch changes (which have not being tested on their own, only in the context of Alpha) is just as bad as releasing completely untested changes (ahem, PTRS buff on Guards, which came out of nowhere). Relic loves to play that mysterious game of, "what random thing shall we add on the patch". Previous changelog of #JustRandomRelicDecisions: Decreasing long range dmg of Irregular/Partysan lmgs Making Dp-28s on Irregulars a Downgrade Increasing cost of Irregulars for no reason. Forcing Ostruppen to become shitstruppen Decreasing reload time on t-34/76 by 1 second since nobody was complaining Nerfing PPsH into a relatively worthless state for the great cost of 40 munis! Removing merge for conscripts and Partysans(Ninja change) Turning the Sturmovik into a worthless piece of ** for 180 munis Turning the KV-2 into a worthless piece of ** for 630 mp and 230 Fuel Turning the Panzerwerfer into a uneffective artillery unit Giving us extra warspoil options with nothing to do(except for bulletins) In: Lobby
Thread: Patch notes for 23rd June23 Jun 2015, 14:12 PM NEVER FORGET TODAY BOYS. I hope you have enough Paks and Stugs to handle dis meta. You can only try so hard BALANCE *Increase the Number of Viable Strategies in the Game* Make core tech tree units more desirable Increase the viability of light vehicle combat. Promote and Encourage Combined Arms Reduce Negative User Experiences in Gameplay Reduce the amount of frustrating moments that can be caused by undesirable gameplay Improve usability and remove unintended behavior from the game General game balance tuning Reduce the amount un-desired randomness generated PTRS & DP28-LMG This weapon drop rates were set way higher than other weapons; basically setting the drop rate in line with other weapons. The Guard Troops carry a lot of droppable weapons so they always seem to drop a lot more weapons than any other Infantry squads. We’ve decided to reduce the drop rate to compensate for this. Drop rate of PTRS at rifle and DP-28 LMG to from 33% to 10% This should cause more incentive to acquire even moar Guards. T-34/85s We felt this change could be delayed inevitably, as T-34/85s are Relic Tier Meta. Without the utilization of T-34/85s how are you going to own everything with Guard Blobs all by themselves? Panzerfaust / AT Grenade/ Rifle AT Grenades We are retuning how infantry snares work; as they act as a big deterrent to using light vehicles. We hope this will encourage more cover and positional play with infantry to deal with vehicles. Can no longer deal Engine Destroy critical Can no longer generate critical to units over 75% HP for Medium and Heavy Vehicles We felt this change would allow more players to go Guards instead of Conscripts CAS Why change the meta? Stug E Call in We felt the Stug E was over performing against infantry so we are reducing its rate of fire. We have also decided to bring its health in line with the Stug G Reload increased from 3.8 to 5.3 Health increased from 400 to 560 So we gave it more health, reload doesn't matter when you have lots of StugEs In: Lobby