Says the guy who relies on spamming T70's. Just sayin...

Canada
Canada
Thread: T-70 Balance25 Nov 2013, 17:55 PM
Says the guy who relies on spamming T70's. Just sayin... ![]() In: COH2 Balance |
Thread: T-70 Balance25 Nov 2013, 17:40 PM
After watching SNF and having experience it myself, I think it's fair to ask the question if the T-70 needs to be sightly nerfed even without taking into consideration the Soviet Industry Commander. I think what I hate the most about it is that a PAK cannot hit the damn thing most of the time, so I think a vehicle size increase and make it 65 fuel would work. Thoughts ? In: COH2 Balance |
Thread: This is suppose to be a strategie game?25 Nov 2013, 14:15 PM
I really didn't feel like I was outplayed and felt really comfortable in this game, even when the Ace rolled up, maybe it felt different for me because I was playing the game and I was comfortable in every battle I had vs. my opponent even if he won some of them. That being said, I'm not saying that he wasn't capable of beating me but I really didn't agree with the way the game let him do it in this replay. BUT What my point was about this game is exactly what you said:
In: Replays |
Thread: MAP: 1v1 - Commune22524 Nov 2013, 22:18 PM
good job! In: Map Sharing |
Thread: #SNF5 3rd Quali Sign-ups Thread24 Nov 2013, 19:05 PM
Scratch me, can't make it ![]() Steam Alias: Zero Steam ID: 76561197968294244 In: SNF5 Third Quali |
Thread: This is suppose to be a strategie game?22 Nov 2013, 20:48 PM
So your mind absolutely rang no bells whatsoever when you suddenly saw a vet 3 MG42 appear out of nowhere ? As a strategist you'd not even remotely researched the new doctrines now out for 2 weeks or so ?. I have not played a lot of games since the release of Turning Point because of school, being a Strategist is not my job, it's something I applied for to eventually write a guide to help introduce new players to 1v1 because I wanted to help. Plus I really don't agree that because I do not pay for a feature, that I need to do research in order to be able to win. If you agree with this, then you agree that it is Pay to Win. I've never agreed with the commander model and never will and will never purchase any of them.
I agree with you, I did lose some units in bad ways. Where I don't agree with you is who was winning this game. Like I said, I did lose some units but so did he... but he also lost total map control during most of the game. If you look at the resources and VPs throughout the whole game, I was in total control. I don't mind losing a game, but I lost this game because of ONE mistake, letting that ONE single unit drive into my base. If it was another tank, it would of died, it was almost dead anyways. BTW, even with mines, AtGuns and AT Grenades that unit could of entered my base. Mines can be destroyed by infantries, AT grenades might not penetrate and it can easily just pass by at-guns. The reason of my title is because this unit is too forgiving, way too much power for too little risk. In: Replays |
Thread: And this is suppose to be a strategic game ?22 Nov 2013, 20:10 PM
Make sure to check if they have the doctrine, and if they do keep a keen eye on how the game progresses, its all about preparation. Either finish the game early with a base rush, or mine everywhere and have at least 3 T34 that all try to ram together.. try IL-2 bomb as well, drop it the moment the rams hit, so even if you only score a crew shock, its gonna to get wasted by four 50kg bombs. Yes I could of won with some adjustments, but I really don't agree that one single unit can win you the game like this. In: COH2 Balance |
Thread: This is suppose to be a strategie game?22 Nov 2013, 18:38 PM
Well i don't see how you can question this being a strategy game when you didn't exactly play very strategically either. I don't agree with this one bit. After winning during the whole game, only ONE unit was able to stop me, the Tiger Ace. And this is why it's in a way PAY TO WIN. I have had no experience vs. this doctrine before, so how am I suppose to practice vs. it ? So the one who purchases this commander already has the advantage from knowing something I can't even know or practice. Yes I could of put some mines, but I didn't think that ONE unit could simply come into my base and kill it. Why do I need mortars when I can flank his position with all the units I had, including 2 shocktroops with smoke to dodge the MG. If it was a normal Tiger, I would of taken it out easy. So what, after winning the whole game I should fear and prepare for again, ONE single unit that can simply go in my base and destroy it without any opposition ? that's ridiculous. Was I smart for not putting those mines ? no, I should of had. Should it cost me the game ? no. In: Replays |
Thread: And this is suppose to be a strategic game ?22 Nov 2013, 16:12 PM
If you know you create yet another thread about it, why don't you post it in the existing one.... cuz I was lazy and frustrated ![]() In: COH2 Balance |
Thread: This is suppose to be a strategie game?22 Nov 2013, 14:55 PM
maybe I could of done something different, but still no skilled required to do what my enemy did. (I'm not saying that my enemy had no skills) In: Replays |
cblanco ★
보드카 중대
VonManteuffel
Heartless Jäger
