Did I say it was your playercard?
In fact, I ask someone who plays 1v1 to get to the top of the 4v4 ladder, with a picture of a scarecrow to show that it doesn't matter at all, because the strength or weakness of an argument does not rely on who speaks the argument.
Instead, you post a playercard of someone who isn't top 1v1, and who simultaneously isn't top 4v4 either.
Except hes top 3v3 in an arranged team with me...
Thats the whole point.
Two good players and one terrible player made it to the top of the 3v3 ladder.
So, I've been simultaneously top of the 1v1, 2v2, and 3v3 ladder at some point in the game.
Strawman or not, the point you made earlier about 3s and 4s requiring "skill" that you have yet to define is still in contest, as proven by this photo.