Profile of Bulgakov

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 987

General Information
Steam: 76561198061121041


Thread: There has never been a worse time to be a Wehrmacht player.29 Jul 2014, 15:02 PM Jump back to quoted post29 Jul 2014, 14:33 PMFrikadelleXXL Could you please stop with this playercard shit please? 1. Please stop swearing. Learn to speak without disgusting expletives. 2. A playercard can be a strong indicator of a player's understanding of the game. It's not a guarantee but if someone has hardly played as one or another faction then it is unlikely he doesn't understand the faction very well. I understand you don't like it because it suggests your arguments are not well balanced. The more balanced the playercard, the more balanced the argument. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Katyusha seriously need a nerf27 Jul 2014, 16:40 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Jul 2014, 15:33 PMVaz The extreme fragility and high relative costs warrants the high damage factor to me. It warrants it for you because you never face it. If you played as the other side, you would see why people are complaining. I understand it's a nice toy for you. I understand it helps you win. What I don't understand is why you don't see what it's like to face it before making comments and saying it's fine. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: What is up with the Okw27 Jul 2014, 15:26 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Jul 2014, 15:22 PMFrikadelleXXL Guys, maybe you come up with arguments or simply stay away? It's right. Especially in team games the allies are on the backfoot everytime while the german can choose how they wish to play. The issue with the bazooka / BAR and the early Pumas is a great example for this. Edit: This thread is a perfect example where the Mods and Admins have to punish these non sense posts!!! Allies are not always on the back foot. Ami early game is strong. Bazook is 15 fuel and 2 will counter a puma very well. Puma costs much more than bazooka. About Stuka za Fuss I can agree it's a bit powerful. Still, it can be dodged if you listen for it. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Laser-Homing AT Grenades and Rifle Grenades27 Jul 2014, 13:56 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Jul 2014, 13:43 PMSpielführer Bullshit. In CoH1 we did not have Rifle Nades like in CoH2 and they just changed it lately to homing Nades. So maybe shake a leg... "bullshit"? He was talking about sticky bombs which were also homing. No need to swear at people. I think they need to be 100% hit to avoid people running their tanks & vehicles all over everything. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USF Recon Doctrine Commander26 Jul 2014, 11:44 AM Jump back to quoted post25 Jul 2014, 14:40 PMKatitof Airdrop combat group is the only thing out of place. Its paras should NOT drop with thompsons(they still got 3 and no ability) and either the gun should come with the crew or shouldn't come in at all and the price of call-in should be cut. As long as it comes with empty AT gun you either need to flank first anyway, which cancels the point of paradrop unless you want to donate free AT gun to your opponent or call them next to your own forces, which again, cancels the point of paradrop. This commander is too weak I agree but what are you saying about the paradrop? If it came fully crewed, would you drop it on a flank or behind enemy lines? You'd be gifting them an AT gun + Exp. Being uncrewed does not cancel the point of a paradrop. The point is convenience, not having to use build ime + move time to the front. Just insta-gun! Drop it near your ambulance, crew it and reinforce. Stil, this commander has some weak point. No sniper-crits on pathfinders? In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: July 25 patch notes25 Jul 2014, 20:59 PM Jump back to quoted post25 Jul 2014, 20:50 PMKatitof If you'd paid some attention instead of raging you'd knew that the only change m15 got was range reduction, nothing else. Cruzz admitted he made a mistake, but how would you know that? You're busy crying that bugs affecting balance in noticeable way are fixed. I think what he's saying is that it would have been better to leave the bugs as they were, since fixing them only worsened the current meta. They could've been fixed later when other more serious changes were made like a damage reduction for Stuka zu Fuss and Katyusha were made. No need to say he's crying. If you disagree, just say you disagree. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Katyusha seriously need a nerf25 Jul 2014, 19:39 PM Jump back to quoted post25 Jul 2014, 19:31 PMFrikadelleXXL And you my friend should start to have an objective point of view especially according to things like balance. You are exaggerating, no Katyusha on earth destroys a truck with a single barrage. Pics or didn't happen. Or maybe post a replay No, you really are disgusting Post a replay of you beating Kats vs players your level ok, thx bye, you can't It's amazing you can ignore guys like Siberian and Kreatir who also say it is overperforming. I have my own bias but when players like Siberian/Budwise or even vonivan talk about balance and disagree with me, I reassess what I'm saying. You however just insult people and write smily faces. Sad. Oh and someone posted a replay proving you wrong, so... In your face. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: M36 Jackson Tank Destroyer25 Jul 2014, 12:07 PM I play mostly Germans but I gotta say the Jackson shouldn't be nerfed. US AT is just horrible apart from Jackson. It's so light, it can't take more than 3 hits. Seems like a fair trade-off. Excellent power and pen but low health. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Der Fallschirmjäger25 Jul 2014, 10:27 AM I feel they do pretty good damage but how about if they got a received accuracy buff or armour or something? 'Cos they do get ripped to pieces a bit fast @ Kreatir - It's not like they can destroy the B4, just decrew it. Try not building it near houses or guard it with an MG. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Maxims vs the OKW 25 Jul 2014, 00:45 AM Jump back to quoted post23 Jul 2014, 18:17 PMKatitof Please tell me, what exactly contradicts here? In other thread I've said MGs won't stop much greater menpower investment. In the 2nd post I confirmed that. What exactly is contradicting here with what? Because to me it seems rather consistent. The contradiction seems to be this: Of MG34/42: you said it shouldn't be expected to handle units that cost a lot more than it. Of Maxim: you seem to be saying Obersoldaten are too effective vs Maxim. I may have misread you though, correct me if I'm wrong. In: COH2 Balance