Profile of Le Wish

The pacific would also get rid of blizzards

But lets add TYPHOONS

13. Soldiers in ww2 never hesitated to jump into a burning molotov and burn to death just to improve their cover.

Great you hang in there Gary!

Well, the big issue here is rather the 10 adjustment games In my opinion.

I agree with you on the top 10 or even 100 rank ami. It shows what teams are great. In that perspective it's a really great feature. But for us guys down the ladder. I'm ranked around the 2000s. In 2v2s. Ladders isnt everything, but knowing im around there feels good. It's not an honest representation since I play with a lot of different ppl, I know that very well. But the amount of team combinations are staggering. I'm going to do a lame comparison here but bare with me. Any sports team are ranked by their team efforts not on the individual line-up. Either they win, or they don't, no matter who is on the field, they will move up or down the ladder as a team. What I'm trying to get across is the sheer number of positions occupied with the same player on the same ladder. Few if none players play on multiple teams in "real sports" the same season. I know that out of the 130 000+ Playing 2v2 I know I was 2000.

That said, it's fun to see with who you get the best teamgames with, and that your overall rank doesn't shoot down the drain because you are training up a new guy. Don't get me wrong, I like this addition, I am simplytryong to point out stuff that I feel needs to be lifted in the discussion. I don't want to go back to the old system, more help with tuning in the new.

A solution then.

1 display the total amount of teams in each game mode somewhere.
2 display what percentile you are in of all players. If I'm ranked 20000 with playerdude65 but that's top 5%, hell! that would make me happy.

If you do n1 hen the n2 shouldn't be all that difficult either. Just maths.



... Last edit....

I have seen the stuff I suggested somewhere for the old ladder. Think it was on the official site.