Profile of insaneHoshi

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 911

General Information
Steam: 76561197989687200


Thread: Idea for rebalancing soviet and usf tiers + brits13 Aug 2017, 23:43 PM Basically you want to remove the cons of making a choice and going a different tiers while keeping all the benefits. Although I do agree that the scott could use some mild nerfs. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Buff the Storm Tiger pls!!!12 Aug 2017, 09:17 AM Also they nerfed the AOE a while back, but they did not change the explosion effect, so it can be sometimes misleading. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Access to balance forum should be restricted11 Aug 2017, 22:52 PM This guy could control the medieval mediterranean trade sphere with the amount of salt he mines. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Conscripts need to be balanced11 Aug 2017, 22:50 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Aug 2017, 21:56 PMkarolllus Holy fuck sorry my bad its not 44 its 41. I admit that was a mistake on my part. ITS STILL HIGH AS FUCK for 60 muni and no upgrade xD basically comparable with double bars costing 120 muni and upgrade xD Pls go away little troll. Show me your playercard to validate your point of view so at least I can treat you seriously. 8.27 2 + 4.943 = 31.36 =/= 41 I could try to find math's playercard if you want me to. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Conscripts need to be balanced11 Aug 2017, 19:26 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Aug 2017, 19:20 PMkarolllus Oh I do read with comprehension but his assumption is just simply bad. 2 grens? . At least now I know who Im playing against. Funny, Im high ranked in both 1v1 and 2v2 but I dont remember ever playing against you Hoshi Its not an assumption if its true, Fights dont occur until last man standing. And either way, you didn't actually read what he said, so you kinda owe him an apology. and being ranked 50-100 in 2v2 isnt high lol In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Conscripts need to be balanced11 Aug 2017, 19:22 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Aug 2017, 17:11 PMkarolllus Volks deal 15% more dmg up close (106% more upgunned), 82% more dmg at long range (117% upgunned) and they cost only 4% more initial mp and 25% more reinfocement cost. But Volks have 27% ((440-320)/440) less total HP, stop just looking at one side of the equation Also going by your formula, you can compare volks to penials and see what crazy improvement Penials are for their cost. They do (by your questionable numbers) penials do 27% more damage at close range, 15% more damage at far range, 17% more HP, at the minimal cost increase of 20% and 0% reinforcement cost. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Conscripts need to be balanced11 Aug 2017, 19:05 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Aug 2017, 17:38 PMkarolllus What? Twice the damage means 320 x 2 = 640 not 480. Let me repeat myself for those of an IQ of a retarded chimp with a brain tumor having a stroke who accidentaly got hit on the head with a big rock. If you actually read what he said instead of being an ass you would see his reasonable assumption that one retreats when they get to 2 men. So grens can suffer 160 damage before retreat, and Cons (and any SU squad) can suffer 320 damage before retreat. 320 is 2x 160. Try exercising that reading comprehension skills you are supposed to have. Also your numbers seem off in the above post, Volk STGs dont add 10 close range DPS each. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: FBP: M36 Jackson Discussion5 Aug 2017, 16:59 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Aug 2017, 09:40 AMSturmpanther You know that we make this for free? In our free time! So were is the fairness to us? Oh im sorry, I guess since youve volunteered your time, us common folk don't get a say in what gets changed. Jump back to quoted post5 Aug 2017, 09:40 AMSturmpanther Jackson still lose 1vs1 vs a j4p on vet 0 already. On vet 2 J4p get Ho boost so its even more ez for j4p. And wehrmacht has tellermines, pak40, shreks if you don't like a cheap stug. I mean look at the fuel prize jackson vs stug. Is this how you are actually measuring the effectiveness of the m36? Vs the JP4? WTF Newsflash. The JP4 is Supposed to beat the m36 since A) The Jp4 has no turret so will always lose if its not a head on fight. B) Has kinda crappy pen and accuracy which makes it struggle vs heavy tanks. If you buff the m36 to the point where it beats the Jp4 in a head on fight, exatly what is supposed to be the jp4s tradeoff for having no turret and low maneuverability? Jump back to quoted post5 Aug 2017, 09:40 AMSturmpanther On vet 2 J4p get Ho boost so its even more ez for j4p. Its things like this that make me really doubt your credibility. Earlier in the thread you justified the 600 -> 640 HP buff by saying that 4 shots @ 160 damage a piece will both kill it at both 600 or 640 HP. Well guess what? the Jp4 having 640 Hp at vet0/1 and having 800 HP has no bearing on how hard it is to kill with a M36. After all it takes 4 shots to deal 640 damage and 4 shots to deal 800 damage. Its pretty much what you said before to justify the m36 HP buff. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: FBP: M36 Jackson Discussion5 Aug 2017, 10:12 AM Jump back to quoted post31 Jul 2017, 17:45 PMmiragefla Upcoming Changes for 1.2: -Cost from 380/135 to 400/145 -Accuracy for standard and HVAP from 0.06/0.05/0.03 to 0.055/0.04/0.03 -Far penetration from 180 to 200. You forgot the 600 -> 640 Hp buff In: COH2 Balance
Thread: FBP Update v1.25 Aug 2017, 10:08 AM Jump back to quoted post5 Aug 2017, 09:40 AMSturmpanther You know that we make this for free? In our free time! So were is the fairness to us? Oh im sorry, I guess since youve volunteered your time, us common folk don't get a say in what gets changed. Jump back to quoted post5 Aug 2017, 09:40 AMSturmpanther Jackson still lose 1vs1 vs a j4p on vet 0 already. On vet 2 J4p get Ho boost so its even more ez for j4p. And wehrmacht has tellermines, pak40, shreks if you don't like a cheap stug. I mean look at the fuel prize jackson vs stug. Is this how you are actually measuring the effectiveness of the m36? Vs the JP4? WTF Newsflash. The JP4 is Supposed to beat the m36 since A) The Jp4 has no turret so will always lose if its not a head on fight. B) Has kinda crappy pen and accuracy which makes it struggle vs heavy tanks. If you buff the m36 to the point where it beats the Jp4 in a head on fight, exatly what is supposed to be the jp4s tradeoff for having no turret and low maneuverability? Jump back to quoted post5 Aug 2017, 09:40 AMSturmpanther On vet 2 J4p get Ho boost so its even more ez for j4p. Its things like this that make me really doubt your credibility. Earlier in the thread you justified the 600 -> 640 HP buff by saying that 4 shots @ 160 damage a piece will both kill it at both 600 or 640 HP. Well guess what? the Jp4 having 640 Hp at vet0/1 and having 800 HP has no bearing on how hard it is to kill with a M36. After all it takes 4 shots to deal 640 damage and 4 shots to deal 800 damage. Its pretty much what you said before to justify the m36 HP buff. In: COH2 Gameplay