Profile of TheGentlemenTroll

Jump back to quoted post9 Sep 2018, 05:23 AMMakiesKurisu

never meant to get back, grenade only at lower price

Jump back to quoted post5 Sep 2018, 23:21 PMTobis

I was more annoyed with the stg being the starting weapon because it's literally the best possible gun to use by nature of it being an assault rifle. On the class that is anti-infantry AND anti-tank they have an anti-everything weapon good at all ranges. Incredibly silly from a balance point, unless they make the gun uselessly bad.

Battlefield has never been a realistic game; I just want a WW2 sandbox game where I can pew pew with cool weapons and tanks.

Jump back to quoted post4 Sep 2018, 14:21 PMcreating_havok

I don't mind the cost, I was just wondering if they forgot about it, didn't care for it, had plans for it later, or what. Genuinely just curious.

Jump back to quoted post5 Sep 2018, 21:00 PMG.VonManstein

Very good, thank you man! How about teching for a 4 player axis team? Is it wise for a couple to stay invested in tier 2, while others quickly tech to t3 and t4?

Also, commander recommendations for the wher?

Jump back to quoted post5 Sep 2018, 20:29 PMFichtenMoped

I get where you are coming from but don't you think it would be shittier gameplay wise if you were forced to use weapons and vehicles depending on a map all the time?

Again: Historical accuracy doesn't really matter to me when it comes to multiplayer gameplay tbh and I seem to fail to see this argument when people weren't complaining about automatic rifles in BF1 half as bad