USF is strong in early and late game, rifles are like elite infantry and they got smoke granade and jackson with sherman combo melt evrything so whats your problem man ? OKW is weak on evry stage of game when u play as usf jackson can easliy solo KT with micro |
Maybe in 1vs1 is strong but in 4vs4 i always feel USF is behind with fuel and tech, brits or okw have cheap first truck or bulding but USF? In my opinion captain is only solution for 4v4 because M1 at.
60 fuel for that bulding is way too much and having in mind that side tech like granades or bar/zook cost a lot too i dont look at ambulance because okw have same side tech with medics. I think sherman should be on battlefield at same time like crommwell not panhter |
I do think replacing ppsh for a dp28 upgrade
That sounds great for me, better synergy with hit the dirt |
usf need more late game commmanders so add sherman e8 to recon and pershing to mechanized  |
3 ptrs per squad its not bug ? |
I like it, no more fuel drop for fast KT and oficer is awesome |
Hmm...now lets compare the different strongness from KT vs Pershing..and bofors vs OKW AA emplacment.
a pershing can destroy a kt with little bit rng
a OKW AA cant win vs a bofors ....not 10 could win...and the performanche from both units are from different worlds...while pershing is not that weak which do you want to tell us here..
dont bullshit pls
pershing is just comet on drags but no heavy tank that can 1vs1 with KT u mad ? |
A better question is, why Heavy Cavarly has both the Pershing and Rangers? Better tank options and better infantry options in the same doctrine, where is this headed - apart from being an OP PTW DLC?
The Rangers are really oddball choice there and they would fit in far better into a light infantry centered doctrine like Recon support while Heavy Cavarly armored doctrine would benefit from something more armor/combined arms-related, like M5 HT or M10 call ins.
orrr better question why okw has lefh and pak43 in one commander AND they still have akcess to KT hmm weird
i want pershing and priest in one doctrine pls |
The real (non-moronic) question is why pershing, unlike tiger 2, has no teching requirement, why shoot like a stug and is faster than a jackson despite having no tech requirement, same armor as tiger, can throw free grenades at atg and infantry on top of being extremely cheap compared to other heavies ?
Why can double bar yoloblobber faction that was supposed to have such powerful stuff like compensation for armor weaknesses get an heavy as armored as ost heavy, which is doctrinal nontheless in a faction supposed to rely on armor...for some reason.
Why can sherman have as much penetration as panzer 4, be cheaper than panzer 4, have nondoc smoke deployable anywhere, have he shells and self repair for free if armor shouldn't be usf strenght ?
Why axis have no sniper of infantry with TD range like m8 motor carriage ?
Why can riflemen equip 2 lmg but grenadiers only 1 ?
Why can usf fill ALL holes in their roster but ost can't have a yolo "spam cuz most cost efficient-all ranges + smoke mainline, who cares about skill and correct placement" doctrinal ?
Why only usf has a nondoc offmap and a nondoc recon ?
Why usf can still popcap hack ?
Why aren't usf upgrades fixed, but any unit can pick any weapon, including elites ?
Why usf get the ONLY non doc officer ability,aka ON ME ?
Why only usf get nondoctrinal immobilized crit mine ?
Why only usf has a vehicle that can suppress on the move ?
Why usf hmg has no vet requirement for AP and can sprint and set up in no time ?
u dont know ? USF is op as hell, okw has no chance in 4v4 mode |
>pak43 is easily destroyable...while a doc unit
>17punder is not easily destroyable and is nondoch unit
>AA eplacment from OKW is doc unit and REALLY REALLY easy destroyable/ decrewable
>bofors is a nondoc unit and heavily armed and heavy to destroy in early / midgame..
see what i want to say...?
pls dont cry
and why okw non doc heavy is stonger than pershing in doctrine ?? |