Profile of wouren

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 1281 | Subs: 3

General Information
Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCjzo7fDOd0qKeGcu2Ub9kDA


Thread: No Way to beat Guardspam17 Apr 2016, 01:42 AM Just looking at the chat history I have to give you props for not whining to the other player. It is an urge I have to suppress daily because I'm a baby like that. In: Replays
Thread: Insta squad gibbing rifle grenades need to be nerfed.17 Apr 2016, 01:30 AM Yo I'm 1000 Sovs and I dodge rifle grenades erryday. The only time they get me is when the grenade is launched from behind a hedgerow. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Panzer II is built way too fast17 Apr 2016, 01:19 AM There are commanders that allow you to counter tanks early and avoid t2. Examples are these doctrines and doctrines with these units: light AT gun, guards, AT partisans, and tank hunter tactics. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Reduce Braces Effect/ Mortar Pits less accurate16 Apr 2016, 19:56 PM Remove counter-arty and the game is balanced IMO. Then you can counter emplacements and motar emplacements with long range and vehicle based arty, or multiple leigs. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Why does relic hate Soviets ?14 Apr 2016, 14:33 PM Yes, because it is not like the best players to twitch... And if the enemy has not much experience u can of course win easy with soviets... But with same experience Axis always OP AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA WHAT ARE YOU TRYING TO SAY ALL I WANTED WAS TO UNDERSTAND WHY YOU THOUGHT MAXIMS WERE UP AND I GET THIS In: Scrap Yard
Thread: USSR's Defenses - Way to "heal" Soviets12 Apr 2016, 16:37 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Apr 2016, 16:33 PMMissCommissar AA Halftruck costs too much for to be good "deffensive" tool. 270 MP + 30 Fuel + 120 Ammo for Quad. Just like 2 bunkers + 30 fuel and Tiering up. Concept of MG bunker is much more simplier and costs lesser. But is it not redundant? What would the bunkers add? Two bunkers are immobile and vulnerable to barrages and more vulnerable to tanks. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USSR's Defenses - Way to "heal" Soviets12 Apr 2016, 16:28 PM Shit, I just deleted all I wrote with an edit. 1moment. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USSR's Defenses - Way to "heal" Soviets12 Apr 2016, 16:02 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Apr 2016, 16:00 PMMissCommissar ZiS is deffensive, mortars are deffensive but... Maxim? DShK? A lot of people convinced me, that they both are OFFENCIVE HMGs, not deffensive. And that's quite right, cos with such arc of fire and such small AoE supression it can't effectively be "crowd control tool". For to be good defensive HMG Maxim should have wider arc of fire and area of supression. MG-42 is perfect deffensive HMG, Vikkers is good, 0.50 is awesome. But not Maxim. And about bunker cost... Hm... I think we can make it like "USF bunker" in vCoH. 150 MP + 15 fuel and it will instantly have HMG in - no ammo upgrades. Guess it will be pretty fair. Interesting. How would this be not effective than an MG in a house, other than positioning? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USSR's Defenses - Way to "heal" Soviets12 Apr 2016, 15:55 PM Okay, how much would the bunker cost? Same as Wehrmacht bunker? Would it be like the USF fighting position? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USSR's Defenses - Way to "heal" Soviets12 Apr 2016, 15:40 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Apr 2016, 15:37 PMMissCommissar As I said in first post - DShK MG emplacements, which will be able to build by engineers. Maybe (not sure) - BS-3 heavy AT gun in doctrines instead of M-42 and few other useless abilities. Why would it make sense? Read thread, I explained it wide. Won't write it again. Yes, but most of the things you said were not true or blown out of proportion. Saying things like shocks do not have survivability and emplacements would fix maxim spam. In: COH2 Balance