Profile of Rupert

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 186

General Information


Thread: The spam, it's getting unbearable 3 Dec 2014, 07:00 AM Jump back to quoted post2 Dec 2014, 20:51 PMNathanm465 And then there was a guy who said OKW has but one option and here we get a whole list of viable options, hahaha ooh the irony Uh, doctrine call-ins are not "opener options"... sigh.... ooh the stupidity In: COH2 Balance
Thread: whats the name of this commander?3 Dec 2014, 06:56 AM I got mine via war spoils In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: How the Game Meta moves.3 Dec 2014, 06:53 AM Jump back to quoted post1 Dec 2014, 20:52 PMEsxile Who cares? not me. I'm not telling you if it is good or bad, I'm telling it happens. And I'm also suggesting you that if in your next game you face a M8 that ripe off half of your blob/squads on the field making you bleed as hell and losing the game, you are a smart guy and you'll build a PUMA to counter it same if it delays your T4. And so the OKW -all infantry into T4- meta would decrease. But yet so many whiners on USF vs OKW matchups In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: OKW, the root of most balance issues?3 Dec 2014, 06:41 AM For once I see reasonable discussion about OKW but then again no other factions suffer from squad wipes (which happens way too frequently since last cover patch). I was watching Von play OKW yesterday, and two lag spikes that led to loss of 4 vet squads quickly led to his loss even though he was in a winning momentum. No other faction goes from winning to losing a lategame purely because of RNG squad wipe. This is mostly due to OKW lacking MP-only AT that does not get countered by vehicles. Raketens die in 1 shot from he shots these days. Once enemy manages to maintain an armor force and wait for those inevitable squad wipes, OKW will lose no matter how well he played due to inability to re-train volks/equip shrek/gain vet. The surest sign of losing OKW is 2+ raketens. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: ISU-1523 Dec 2014, 06:33 AM Jump back to quoted post3 Dec 2014, 05:06 AMQueenRatchet123 You went from JT to tiger? If ur gonna lie. at least stick to it Ok so I'm not the only one..... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: suggestion to deter blobbing volks shrecks2 Dec 2014, 16:54 PM Jump back to quoted post2 Dec 2014, 16:30 PMWingZero You can always have a mech truck for fuel to munition income, an ability all armies envy. You do know that its actually a net loss in terms of resources to convert? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: suggestion to deter blobbing volks shrecks2 Dec 2014, 16:08 PM Add units worth producing in T2 med truck and maybe we'll see less volks. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Guard2 Dec 2014, 15:14 PM Jump back to quoted post2 Dec 2014, 15:05 PMWingZero By playing Soviets, I am already restricted to half of my army. OKW has has so many choices for teching and army composition, Soviets on the other hand have to rely on commanders. As of now, Soviet commanders are outdated after WFA expansion. Like how Soviets can do T1 opening via m3 or snipers or T2 oepning with maxims or go 4 conscript opening? While OKW has interesting choices for teching like volks kubel volks opening or volks volks volks opening? I don't think you can call that "many choices", especially if you look at the units from med truck... OKW does one thing: spam volks and tech to T4 for obers and panthers. All other options are usually deperate attempts to recuperate a lost game - which usually fail. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Guard2 Dec 2014, 14:39 PM Jump back to quoted post2 Dec 2014, 14:27 PMbraciszek I would like to think that that acknowledges the Soviet faction as a badly designed faction. If some units apparently have to be bad because others are good, then they would have never put there in the first place or should be removed... To save us all the trouble of bothering they exist. I agree too. Units diversity does not mean having useless units made up by having op units. It's a problem with all factions in general but it seems that's Relic's philosophy behind faction design and balance. However, I'm against nerfing everything to make everything the same. There can be price increase, timing delays, accessibility, popcap, etc... many other ways to balance things around OTHER than chopping numbers. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: The spam, it's getting unbearable 2 Dec 2014, 14:25 PM Jump back to quoted post1 Dec 2014, 23:12 PMNathanm465 Btw people, I find it very strange that everyone is bashing on my build order. Isn't it a tad strange that you need one or two specific tactics and build orders to deal with and perhaps defeat a faction? Why are there only one or two tactics that are viable.. That just doesn't seem right to me.. An entire faction rendered almost useless apart from 2 to 4 units which are viable in either one of the "working" tactics. It's not strange that you need rocks to defeat scissors and papers to defeat rocks. You wanting to do whatever random thing you want to do and still come out victorious is obnoxious. How many choices do you think OKW has? A lot less than soviets. Soviets can go T1 or T2 right off the bat, or even 4 conscript opener. All effective against OKW. OKW has one choice. volks. What do you want to OKW player to do? Producing nothing because it's "spam"? Soviet player complaining about "not enough viable tactics" is pretty sad. If you even played a single game of comp-stomp with OKW you would not be ranting such nonsense. In: COH2 Balance