Profile of Butcher

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 1218

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/butcher_ger


Thread: Nerf Luchs (health)?13 Jul 2015, 10:08 AM Jump back to quoted post13 Jul 2015, 09:55 AMJadame! Hey, whoa there, most Russians are sane... most of the time. But so as everybody else. CS:GO proofed me otherwise. Being Russian does not make you crazy but there are some serious fucktards around. If you speak English you are an "American whore", they never use Skype or TS and spam the voice chat, they barely speak English and rage fast. They come in groups so you can´t kick them. And if they speak English it´s like this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RqaCWiUB-i8 Last conversation went like this: Me: Hi. I´ll go A long. Russian teammate: сука американцы Me: Sorry, I can´t speak Russian. Can you speak English? Russian teammate: Fuck you, nuub. From anecdotal experience I can tell you in about half the cases a communication is impossible or rather not wanted. And that in a team based game. Doesn´t apply to all of them but this is an often discussed problem in the CSGO community. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: 2v2: Allies get more wins but less people want to pay them12 Jul 2015, 23:10 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Jul 2015, 22:40 PMFrost Same in Red Orchestra 2. No one want to play soviets cause "germanz better stg 360 scope lolz" Jump back to quoted post12 Jul 2015, 22:47 PMdaspoulos Everybody like german equipment. Except diehard axis haters. You know. Those kinds that thinks relic and everybody who plays as axis are neo-nazis In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Reduce T85 reload time 12 Jul 2015, 15:06 PM Not with the terrible reload time of the Panther. If anything Panther and Tiger are supposed to counter the T-34/85... not the other way around. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ostheer Artillery: 105mm, Panzerwerfer10 Jul 2015, 17:37 PM Jump back to quoted post10 Jul 2015, 17:26 PMatouba The Katyusha is too much better than panzerwerfer, better range,less scatter, lower reload time, and cheaper tech cost... The werfer is just S-H-I-T now. As an OST player, I never use it. You must push the werfer on the enemy's face to fire more accurately. Just good design for an artilley unit lol. The funny thing about this is, that players already complained about an ineffective Panzerwerfer and general lack of attractiveness of Ostheer T4 a year ago. Relics answer to this was increasing the Panzerwerfers reload time. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Pershing ? 7 Jul 2015, 17:07 PM Yet the difference is that it does not matter whether you get an Ostwind or a Möbelwagen. Germans have the tank advantage anyways - who cares if it´s a Panther or a King Tiger, a Jagdpanzer or a Jagdtiger? Introducing another class of vehicle out of the blue makes a huge difference. I´m not looking forward to Tiger copies everywhere... that´s my opinion. It´s lazy and USF are still going to lack decent medium tanks. Next step could be a sniper (dual) for OKW and USA. Maybe a Willies Jeep Kübelwagen equivalent for USA. CAS for everybody. In: Lobby
Thread: Pershing ? 7 Jul 2015, 16:35 PM Jump back to quoted post6 Jul 2015, 22:40 PMPhy Of course not, any other faction in the game has heavy tanks. Do I really have to answer that? You obviously don´t want to understand me. The USF is designed around medium tanks, yet lacks good medium tanks outside of doctrines. Before mirroring a Tiger, it would be nice to have either Hellcats, some 76mm Sherman variant (M4A1 isn´t in the game for example) or access to the 76mm as a weapons upgrade for the already existing Shermans. You could add a Jumbo as a heavy variant. Vehicles that actually played a role in the war in more than a handful engagements. I prefer that over seeing Tiger copies in 2/3rds of the games played. In: Lobby
Thread: Cruzz's The More You Know7 Jul 2015, 16:29 PM Oh cool, finally I can use my three StuG E reload speed bulletins. Never had the StuG E doctrine. StuG G ROF increases even further now and with vet it´s going to be insane. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Pershing ? 6 Jul 2015, 09:04 AM Considering that Tiger crews were usually experienced veterans and aware of the box design, you would most likely face a Tiger in Mahlzeitstellung. This explains why it was still a threat later in the war. I would call the 76mm Sherman a tougher opponent though, because the Russian T-34 (even in the 85mm version) lacked pretty much anything that lets your crew perform up to the task. Tbh: I think giving the Amis a better medium tank in form of a 76mm Sherman upgrade and a Jumbo as a heavy would have been sufficient. Maybe a Hellcat for doctrines. In: Lobby
Thread: Stug G vs. Soviet and Allied armor6 Jul 2015, 08:40 AM Jump back to quoted post6 Jul 2015, 08:30 AMHolyUnlyrical_Lyrics Still don't see Stug G as often as I see t34-85s or a Panzer 4 Because at the time you can build your first StuG/Panzer IV, you are most likely facing infantry and AT guns rather than tanks. The Panzer IV is better at crushing, has two more MGs and a turret. Considering the AI of the StuG is going to be nerfed soon (near accuracy value wrong), the first tank should always be a Panzer IV, unless you have been outplayed and need AT options. The StuG is a good option to not get caught with your pants down later though. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Armor Bulletin Stack?5 Jul 2015, 21:25 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Jul 2015, 15:58 PMHolyUnlyrical_Lyrics stacking reduced costs bulletins doesn't seem to suppression bulletins do, armor bulletins seem to work for me.. I´m building 46 ammo Tellermines if I feel like it. The triple reduced mine cost bulletin makes people build minesweepers though - destroying the whole surprise effect behind the mine. The triple armor stack for the Panther might be the best bulletin combination in the game - if it works. In: COH2 Gameplay