Profile of aaa

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 1487

General Information
Register Time: 12 Aug 2014, 04:00 AM


Thread: Conscripts need mid-game buff26 Jul 2015, 11:13 AM 1. LMG must be doctrinal and nerfed by 30%. Another solution would remove LMG from grens, and add it to some expensive infantry. 2. or make a cons PTRS upgrade non doctrinal In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Conscripts need mid-game buff26 Jul 2015, 11:06 AM Jump back to quoted post22 Jul 2015, 04:13 AMFiresparks lower conscript reinforcement cost and time once you build t3 and t4. yeah that will make them a capable late game unit. Looks like ts better to ignore forums not to become silly In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: volksgrenadier modernization MP-40 and Senior Sergeant25 Jul 2015, 21:24 PM folksgrnadiers doest need modernization. They are fine now. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Enable Soviets to skip T325 Jul 2015, 15:54 PM They say they want 2 things 1. More viable builds 2. More usage of light vehivcles So if they allow to make T4 after any 2 buildings both this goals would be accheaved. There will be so much more different builds that its hard to list them all. Always a light vehicle M3 or T3 units. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Soviets OP25 Jul 2015, 10:29 AM Jump back to quoted post25 Jul 2015, 10:19 AMSwift I don't believe the M5 is OP, you just need to fight it creatively. If you can trap it or draw it into the line of fire of AT it goes down fast, don't run your infantry to it and expect it to die when you breathe on it. Its just redicolous how and why they complain about m5 while its a mediocre unit. Im afraid to think what axis will be doing here if there will be posssibility to play T1+T2 into T4. There wiil be their shit everywhere. one vesion is that most of them are abusers who play heavy T1. If there will be only sov t1 and t2. Germs would base pin any player with that T1. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Enable Soviets to skip T323 Jul 2015, 23:28 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Jul 2015, 23:21 PMMr. Someguy No, because T3 does not cost the same as T1 or T2. A T1 + T2 approach would be cheaper and thus will quickly become the metagame, and T3 would be dead again. As I ve said It wont be dead vs abusers cuz fast T70 is only way to punish heavy T1 play. Plus they can make T4 available after you make at least 2 T1 units and 2 T2 units. This will prevent fast tech to medium tanks. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Enable Soviets to skip T323 Jul 2015, 23:28 PM copy In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Enable Soviets to skip T323 Jul 2015, 23:09 PM Jump back to quoted post23 Jul 2015, 22:46 PMsomenbjorn . Su-76 are a more effective way of knocking mgs and bunkers. M5 will deal with mindless A-moving grenblobs (advance with a pak and your golden) Su-76 will break them up. Are are seriously saying that? If so Im fully disagree. Su76 and M5 for me is in top 3 soviet worst units. top 1 worst unit is surely penal squad. ZIS >> SU76 and it doesnt matter what units you are facing. Pak is a hard counter to SU76. It has much longer range and dps. Jagpanz, if facing su76, gets free vet5 and becomes invinsible. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: MG 42 suppression reduction? 23 Jul 2015, 22:38 PM Jump back to quoted post23 Jul 2015, 22:06 PMelchino7 Nope, still suppressing single conscript squad on green cover at 5-6 burst at 15m and 10-11burst at 30m. If 2 con squad, not sharing same cover but at a distance minor to 13m and all on green cover, the squad been shot at will get suppressed on 4-6 burst despite the range. At least for me I clearly saw 100 times that prev. patch units were getting supressed in 1 burst in 1 sec. Their cover was irrelevant. Right now they stay under fire long enough to kill that mg if its in red cover. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: MG 42 suppression reduction? 23 Jul 2015, 18:32 PM If you make any tech building not 4 cons opening then OH outnumber you with mixed army thats kind of wrong. In: COH2 Balance