Profile of JohnnyB

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 2396 | Subs: 1

General Information
Steam: 76561198090176100


Thread: Kick Mark Target from COH 223 Jul 2015, 08:32 AM I don't think it's anything wrong with mark target, it has counterplay + in some cases is the only chance an allied player has against some german havies that need to be killed fast before they eat all your army at supper speed (Tiger Ace being one of them). So the idea is, as long as the existence of Tiger Ace (with smoke and blitz lel), KT and Jagdtiger is ok, so it's mark target's existence. Let's not proceed like Relic does and totaly burry a faction, even if they are soviets . That's about it. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Osttruppen Irregulars and Partisans23 Jul 2015, 05:59 AM Jump back to quoted post17 Jul 2015, 18:06 PMBeinhard Osttruppen beste unit ingame Congratulations sir. You just invented a new strategy. It's simply brilliant! In: COH2 Balance
Thread: MG 42 suppression reduction? 23 Jul 2015, 05:49 AM Jump back to quoted post23 Jul 2015, 00:16 AMMadness WOW!. You really are the most disgusting fanboy on these forums. Anyway keep posting i find enjoyment in reading your shit post. Even though it has been proven time and time again that you shouldn't have any say when it comes to balancing Bravo, you "ad hominem attack" sweetee, you did a great job. By the way, is something wrong in approving someone that said exactly what you would say? Then the person who posted that is a disgusting fanboy also. You insulted 2 people in one post. Good job! I am realy surprised that the number of people astonished about this "nurf mg42" posts is so low after an entire comunity whined no longer than 1 month ago or such, that COH2 has no blob control / anti blob weapon. When that arrived, now you are crying for nerfs. It's beyond any logic or common sense. But why trying to lie myself? There is no common sense or logic in people like you, and you represent the majority. Next time when a sensible thing like requesting Mg42 fixing will be asked (as per 1 - 1,5 months ago) I will totaly be against because worst than not fixing a thing is fixing it, letting it to properly work for one month, then totaly break it again. Why did you people ask for MG42 fixing in the first place? It should have been never changed, if it's to be changed now. That is truly disgusting for your info. Not approving someone who made a good point. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: MG 42 suppression reduction? 22 Jul 2015, 20:44 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Jul 2015, 19:17 PMiTzDusty Early 2015: Infantry blobs a move into MGS, works 70 percent of the time due to lackluster suppression and tendency for gun to combust from damage. MGs skipped by players like Paula. Early mid 2015: Guns now live on as long the soul of their operators exist in this world. Damage is cool. Blobs still swarm mgs that are not well microed and interlocked. MG42s now viablw through superior positioning. Mid 2015: MG42 now suppresses blobs well, previous attempts of a moving no longer work. Players in shock at learning what a flanking maneuver is, the existence of propelled clouds of thick, vision blocking smoke, win streaks are ruined. ELO drastically shifting as crutch using players now have trouble. Late mid 2015: The day of reckoning. Players still in denial over existing counters, crutch call in meta removed. MG42 comes seconds earlier, T1 delay is now viable, ostruppen make appearances. Previous top 500 players now descending to 4 digit ranks. Game balance is blamed. L2p, learn to smoke, learn to flank, learn to veto, learn to true sight, learn to adapt. Sincerely, someone who has countered MG42s just fine. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: M5 Quadrush22 Jul 2015, 13:39 PM Actually, I believe the actual M5 Quad it's not ok, something must be done with it without cutting its latest gained efficiency. I would delay the supression feature or make the upgrade more expensive. First solution though. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: MG 42 suppression reduction? 22 Jul 2015, 13:29 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Jul 2015, 12:47 PMElSlayer Facts: - Slower building rate is compensated by moving it to T0 (don't have to wait for building T1) - Cost increase is compensated by increasing Wehrmacht starting manpower Personal opinion: - Cost effectivness has increased despite increase of its cost (long range damage buff 2 patches ago, suppression buff last patch) Anything else? Yes. L2Adapt. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: MG 42 suppression reduction? 22 Jul 2015, 12:34 PM The mg 42 is finaly what it should be, got a cost increase, a slower building rate and you wanna nurf it? BURN WICH! In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Soviets OP22 Jul 2015, 05:48 AM Jump back to quoted post22 Jul 2015, 01:03 AMVonIvan That doesn't need to happen once the mods get through and silence those who are being un-constructive in this thread. /Back on topic folks. T3 simply needs to be set time wise to t2/t3 Axis wise so that they have a chance to work against it without having to bleed mp early game. Several people in this thread allready told you that they didn't take the bait except hardcore soviet fanboys (I regret missing Katitof's post, it must have been hilarious). Spare us of your insipid jokes, you are in love with soviets like a college kid with his sexy math teacher, so nobody will believe you. And because you like gifs, here you are: In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW Tech: Is it Fair? 21 Jul 2015, 13:34 PM Jump back to quoted post21 Jul 2015, 13:19 PMOrionHunter88 I know that was a joke. But I'd be open to the 88 being a doctrinal upgrade for the Panzer HQ. Maybe swap that out with Pak 43 (copy/paste from Wher). Could be interesting. Static 88s are seriously under represented in COH2. They are not represented at all (the AA 88 it's unique, the PAK 43 it's a different thing). And that's strange because 88s were emblematic for german army. But there are many allied tanks/vehicles more powerfull that the current units in game and they are not represented eather. For instance, the soviet KV-85. So I think it's kinda fair, even if it's dull. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Fallschrimjagers need love! 21 Jul 2015, 13:08 PM Falls are fine, don't need buffs, don't need nerfs. What they need is a smaller reinforcement price. That's all. In: COH2 Gameplay