Having a big amount of CoH1 is huge too, apart from having some different units they game play very similar micro wise at least so having 500-600+ hours there helps a lot too
I've only got about 180 hours in CoH2 (only had it since June) but played at least 600-700 games if not more in CoH1. And probably like 1/4 to 1/3 of that is 1v1 yet my best rank is ~1000 for OKW.
IS-2 armor doesn't kill.
Tigers 88mm does both vehicles and infantry alike.
IS-2 is effective only against vehicles currently(inb4 spasms of denial-play with it and see how awesome AI it currently have without DSHK upgrade).
I will allow Cruzzi to replay for other stuff as I personally am tired of reasoning with brick walls who always know better even if reality slaps something entirely different right into their faces.
Is this some kind of joke?
IS2 completely rapes infantry, i've had full and almost full squads wiped by it many times. It is better than tiger every way except reload and blitz.
Two matches a week? Sorry but no, maybe 2-3 a day minimum to get to just a decent level. With two matches a week you'll barely even be able to improve in comp stomps let alone 1v1 play.
IS2 front armor is ridiculous, even panzerschreks are bouncing 90% of the time.
Pretty much everything except JT, KT, Ele and Pak43 bounce on IS2 front armor most of the time. The fact that it's quite mobile and can squad wipe adds to the problem, unlike extremely slow JT, KT etc.
The thing that came to my head when I watched that video was that this game needs urgently side armor.
I agree that only the pak has something to do in that engagement, but the PzIV on the left did some good side shots and they all got registered as frontal hits.
I think that the current system makes flanking too hard.
Btw, I don't understand why IS2 can't be better than Tiger. Must all axis tanks be better than the allied ones?
@Kronosaur0s
Maybe because I'm spanish, and sometimes I confuse words.