Profile of BeefSurge

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 1891

General Information


Thread: Cruzz's The More You Know8 Feb 2016, 05:30 AM Jump back to quoted post8 Feb 2016, 05:25 AMNuclear Arbitor in a blob or trickled in one at a time? In a blob In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Cruzz's The More You Know8 Feb 2016, 04:30 AM How many medics does it take to kill a vet 5 MP44 Obersoldaten squad? In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: New Commander: Terror Doctrine8 Feb 2016, 03:41 AM Jump back to quoted post8 Feb 2016, 02:55 AMHans G. Schultz I just realized it is the heavy cavalry commander, because the Pershing is as good as the Panzer IV Command Tank except no aura. I didn't see updated OP, I thought you had knights cross holders replacing command P4, and tiger tank call in. I legitimately support your overall concept, I wasn't being sarcastic or smug. This would bring back vCoH nostalgia which I'm for In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: New Commander: Terror Doctrine8 Feb 2016, 02:47 AM They sound like beefier versions of (spelling) Falimjager. I don't know, I think that giving Ost their own version of heavy cavalry commander might be bad for balance... But it's a yes from me, you sold me. +2 In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: New Commander: Terror Doctrine8 Feb 2016, 02:27 AM Super units are actually against Wehrmacht design, Tiger tank breaks this rule however In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Beef's Beef: Soviet Infantry Woes8 Feb 2016, 01:11 AM I want penal rifle dps, never said it had to be accuracy. (Strawman? Idk tbh but I want to sound smart) And following your con/guard logic, cons are upgraded engineers (discounting abilities ) In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Severely underperforming USF units8 Feb 2016, 00:54 AM Bulldozer reliably wipes static targets In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Severely underperforming USF units7 Feb 2016, 22:34 PM So apparently the m20 could carry 4 passengers plus the crew of 2 M20 crew 4>3, transport capability? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Beef's Beef: Soviet Infantry Woes7 Feb 2016, 22:33 PM Penals damage without flamer is poor, rifle damage (or accuracy, fire rate, whatever) needs an increase before health increase. Any hypothetical dp28 upgrade can have bar stats, or come with two, etc. for the sake of discussing the means and necessity of a change specific implementation matters little because we don't work for lelic. I think that cons aren't analogous to guards because it's guards purpose to kill things and hurt vehicles, while its cons explicit purpose to snare vehicles, build sandbags, flank with oorah while feeding XP to the enemy, etc. Your right on about Penals>shocks though. I also really enjoy the early game infantry skirmishing of riflemen, cons etc taking cover while others come in and flank, it's very tactical and why I love coh-current Penals reward you for ambushing from los blockers or simply moving into your opponents face with flamers and carbines. (the current usage of the unit.) In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Beef's Beef: Soviet Infantry Woes7 Feb 2016, 21:40 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Feb 2016, 20:01 PMAustralian Magic But for long range you have Cons with rifles with quite good vet. So if anyone lacks DP upgrade it's Cons. Semi-auto rifles does not fit DP28 upgrade but standard rifles do. DP-28 cons+ maxims might be too much though. Soviet faction need nondoc infantry long range punch, it can only be penals. (Or maybe engies lol) relics been very clear on their stance on cons, with Penals it's been murkier so a change might happen. Plus profile of dp-28 is more similar to carbine(not really an argument just observation, it would be better) Redoing con veterancy so they die the same but do much more rifle damage would make sense but that wouldn't fit the "utility" role relic has on them unfortunately. In: COH2 Balance