Profile of Mittens

I would like to see a reinforcement cost reduction on tommies 35mp is almost impossible to keep going into the late game. Brits already have a pretty soft spot for the amount of mp they go through.

Health changes to the AVRE and croc are a good balance change while I think they should have kept the damage slightly higher on the AVRE, still a welcome change.

Changes to the wasp are a little iffy, while the range reduction is a great thing, I feel like the damage nerf may be a little over the top as brits rely so heavily on it to help them from getting overwhelmed in the early game (kind of like the kubal). If anything we should buff the suppression or damage on the vikers K upgrade to make it more viable.

Brace changes I feel were not needed without a cost reduction, currently emplacements are a HUGE sink of resources for a unit that cant move nor retreat.

USF still could use a non-doc scout car or a change to the price of the m20/lieutenant. Their tech is still running on the old timing and should be reformatted to allow for more opening strats.

Wher sniper changes are a good start, I like that its a small change to keep it viable but I feel like it still may be a little to high.

Tiger range increase is alright but I feel like the Jackson and firefly will suffer even more from thier low ROF and damage (Jackson).

overall a good patch but some of the overall changes will really hurt brits in the early to mid game while USF is still unviable as they lack any heavy counter armor (AT guns is still shit, slow ROF/damage jackson).

Overall a good patch but the balance is defiantly going to be at a weird spot with huge gaps in each allied faction.

They are supposed to be. Tanks aren't the be all end all in a battle. They should kill tanks, they should be deadly, and you should have to be careful with your armor.

They aren't cheap as they cost as much as a whole inf squad that gets decrewed ez. On the other hand, reketens camo is kinda silly.

Just make it an upgrade

So like 6pm est 9/2/15? and not the 3rd??

"Mostly people have basically 0 idea how to play Brits at this current time since it plays like the opposite of all the other Allied factions. Basically you gain nothing from closing to close range with the enemy and in cover even the basic IS can easily beat out Grens even while still at 4 men at long range.

Focus less on getting a lot of IS, and focus on using Engineers to make up the difference in map control. Both IS and Engineers have .8 received accuracy making them hard to kill while Engineers are much, much cheaper.

Upgrade to Brens as soon as possible, ignore PIATS until later in the game. Don't neglect getting an AEC and 6 pounder as these to things can handle most Axis armor very efficiently. Pick Anvil or Hammer based on your projected needs or just wait until you can actually afford something in Anvil or Hammer.

Brit's greatest strength lies in it's commanders, use their abilities and use them often to turn the tide of battle. Don't be afraid to play conservatively, Brits follow the Build Up --> Break Out formula.
"

I get that but what I'm saying is the break out will never happen due to their MP bleed. You will always get 2v1'ed due to your unit costs as well as lose ground very ez as you are very cover dependent as well as emplacement dependent. It just doesn't work the way the brits are set up rn, their units dont preform well enough (AVRE, commando excluded) to validate their cost both time wise as well as resource wise. They scale better than USF but whats the point if you get cut down by double the army value as yours.

Alex your logic behind your post makes sense but with the balance of their early game so awkward and being cover dependent they cant get to late game unless u are bad and let them get there.