There is no reason why a heavy tank should dominate the battlefield or be more resistant to long range tank destroyers. I think it is a leftover of the heavy call-in meta where everyone got the idea that a heavy tank is what your army should be built around. Tiger should be just that - a heavy tank. One of the options. You have 78 more popcap in your arsenal to supplement it with other units, including the best handheld AT which decimates dedicated enemy tank destroyers.
A Tiger is not too slow for its class, it has really good frontal armour, requires no teching, and its gun packs a really good anti infantry and antitank punch. What else do you want from it? To be more survivable against its hard counters?
If you feel the Tiger isn't worth its resource cost, don't go for it. Wehrmacht has a strong core army and a wide selection of commanders. But I guarantee you lots of players will still use the Tiger.
You just can't use it with impunity if someone invests heavily in end-tier tank destroyers (Su85, FF, M36). And this is precisely as it should be, IMO.
Profile of drChengele
General Information
Steam: 76561198002493220
Residence:
Serbia
Nationality:
Serbia
Timezone: Europe/Belgrade
Steam: 76561198002493220
Residence:
SerbiaNationality:
SerbiaTimezone: Europe/Belgrade
Livestreams
|
|
|
2 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.797136.854+3
- 2.46468.872-1
- 3.871298.745+2
- 4.14465.689-1
- 5.401212.654+3
- 6.21156.790-2
- 7.301128.702+3
- 8.501325.607+4
- 9.408297.579+2
- 10.327119.733-2
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
15
Download
2715
Board Info
1132 users are online:
1132 guests
0 post in the last 24h
1 post in the last week
17 posts in the last month
1 post in the last week
17 posts in the last month
Registered members: 62303
Welcome our newest member, 88betreview
Most online: 4501 users on 26 Oct 2025, 01:00 AM
Welcome our newest member, 88betreview
Most online: 4501 users on 26 Oct 2025, 01:00 AM


. It prompted me to finally fix the bug.
drChengele