Login

russian armor

OKW troops compared to SU/UKF/USF

16 Feb 2018, 19:03 PM
#21
avatar of Tiger Baron

Posts: 3140 | Subs: 2



Ostheer may be following (if I have the time).And the main reasons for making this comparisions were:
- Countering those "Unit X from OKW is OP nerf plz" threads on steam .
- Showing that some OKW units are underperfoming
- Giving other players some kind of advice which units should be used to counter allied units and which better not


Alright just as I figured, thanks.

Can't wait for the Wehr version, because honestly the only thing keep me away from them atm is their 4 man squads to be honest, I used to play OKW before because of their vet, good Armor and retreat point, but now that all of these have been nerfed...
16 Feb 2018, 19:44 PM
#22
avatar of TheGentlemenTroll

Posts: 1044 | Subs: 1



Alright just as I figured, thanks.

Can't wait for the Wehr version, because honestly the only thing keep me away from them atm is their 4 man squads to be honest, I used to play OKW before because of their vet, good Armor and retreat point, but now that all of these have been nerfed...


Being playing Ost more and they are a ton of fun to play. Grens are pretty good against allied infantry and I like them a lot.
16 Feb 2018, 21:43 PM
#23
avatar of Tiger Baron

Posts: 3140 | Subs: 2



Being playing Ost more and they are a ton of fun to play. Grens are pretty good against allied infantry and I like them a lot.


I'd still rather wish they had a 5 man squad upgrade like the British, retreat point (but I guess it would be the nerfed version so no point anymore) and perhaps some beefed up Armor (been playing CoH recently and the Tigers and Panthers there feel sooo much better) but hey, you're kinda right, I'm enjoying them more than before which is sort of all that matters.
16 Feb 2018, 21:51 PM
#24
avatar of ZombiFrancis

Posts: 2742

Infantry AT doesn't deal deflection damage in coh1. Tigers and such can bounce frontal bazooka shots without being whittled down. It's absolutely crazy how much of an effect 0 deflection damage has on making tanks feel like, well, tanks.

Also in coh1, handheld infantry was much less accessible for allies. Unless you got paras or rangers, it was sticky bombs and stolen schrecks.
16 Feb 2018, 22:09 PM
#25
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17875 | Subs: 8

Infantry AT doesn't deal deflection damage in coh1. Tigers and such can bounce frontal bazooka shots without being whittled down. It's absolutely crazy how much of an effect 0 deflection damage has on making tanks feel like, well, tanks.

Also in coh1, handheld infantry was much less accessible for allies. Unless you got paras or rangers, it was sticky bombs and stolen schrecks.


CoH1 is also a game where mini tank dropped from a glider can kill tiger reliably and cost efficiently.
16 Feb 2018, 22:22 PM
#26
avatar of ZombiFrancis

Posts: 2742

Yeah I've watched xcom/xereborn troll people with tetrarchs too. Most things British in either coh kind of fly in the face of balance and design. I mean, CoH1 is indeed a game where there's Opposing Fronts.

And, uh, a stuart in coh2 can solo a KT in that same fashion. I wonder if the new m8 can now that I think about it...
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

252 users are online: 2 members and 250 guests
Crecer13, Gdot
16 posts in the last 24h
42 posts in the last week
96 posts in the last month
Registered members: 44643
Welcome our newest member, Leiliqu96
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM