They are inherently an AT faction, preventing any type of vehicle play by allies. I think it's better if they were not a standalone faction and instead a purchasable Doctrine for the ostheer: The formidable AT Div (Premium)
OpPooopchen, Pshcrecks, Puma, JPIV, JagdTiger, Pak43
Should OKW changed into an Anti-Tonk Doctrine for ostheer?
- This thread is locked
4 Jun 2015, 06:11 AM
#1
Posts: 270
I'll try again.
The source of my frustrations that should be removed
4 Jun 2015, 06:29 AM
#2
Posts: 2396 | Subs: 1
Aren't you tired to write bullpudding?
BeefSurge wrote:
A lot of people have an image of how they want a faction to play, leading to problems. This is why you have people complaining about lack of Soviet bunkers, why T34/76 sucks, why Cons don't scale, Grens don't get normal grenades, Muricans don't get heavy tank, OKW laser weapons and Die Glock Death Bell, etc.
A lot of people have an image of how they want a faction to play, leading to problems. This is why you have people complaining about lack of Soviet bunkers, why T34/76 sucks, why Cons don't scale, Grens don't get normal grenades, Muricans don't get heavy tank, OKW laser weapons and Die Glock Death Bell, etc.
4 Jun 2015, 06:32 AM
#3
Posts: 1653
Pudding yum yum
4 Jun 2015, 08:03 AM
#4
Posts: 128
Really? 2/10.....trolling I hope
4 Jun 2015, 08:07 AM
#5
Posts: 270
No moron, I'm just bringing up balance issues which can be understood from a pro perspective only.
And I don't make many therads, just lurking here once in a month and start one or 2 threads about important game play issues. Current subject is about OKW having too many strong AT options.
And I don't make many therads, just lurking here once in a month and start one or 2 threads about important game play issues. Current subject is about OKW having too many strong AT options.
I'll try again.
The source of my frustrations that should be removed
4 Jun 2015, 08:17 AM
#6
Posts: 2280 | Subs: 2
Permanently Banned10/10 thread m8
There is no recording in all WW2 history of a piat actually knocking off a vehicle. Yes, it was THAT bad.
4 Jun 2015, 08:58 AM
#7
2 
Posts: 1108
And I don't make many therads, just lurking here once in a month and start one or 2 threads about important game play issues
one or two threads? Within an hour or two huh?
http://www.coh2.org/topic/35179/okw-too-many-access-denial-options
http://www.coh2.org/topic/35186/m8a1-stuge
http://www.coh2.org/topic/35180/should-okw-changed-into-an-anti-tonk-doctrine-for-ostheer
http://www.coh2.org/topic/35185/grens-r-nade-and-usf-mk2-forcing-hmgs-to-retreat
http://www.coh2.org/topic/35184/tm-35-and-schu-causing-heavy-engine-crits-in-heavy-vehicles
http://www.coh2.org/topic/35183/poopchen-too-cheap
 | Playercard of MoerserKarL | |||||||||||||||||||
|
4 Jun 2015, 09:31 AM
#8
Posts: 1740
What a useless thread resulting in insultings from both sides...
It is though God by command has withdrawn every other throne.
And God is saying 'No. These people will deal with me alone.'
And God is saying 'No. These people will deal with me alone.'
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
 |
|
|
38 | ||
 |
|
|
659 | ||
 |
|
|
15 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.968562.633+23
- 2.555227.710+11
- 3.29446.865-1
- 4.276110.715+14
- 5.259143.644+3
- 6.250150.625+11
- 7.22491.711+11
- 8.250135.649+1
- 9.19265.747+5
- 10.13556.707+3
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
7
Download
749
Board Info
577 users are online:
577 guests
10 posts in the last 24h
38 posts in the last week
151 posts in the last month
38 posts in the last week
151 posts in the last month
Registered members: 45054
Welcome our newest member, ph365games
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, ph365games
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM