Posts: 104
(what some people would call spam) A lot of talk about units changing tires have already come and gone, But the questions still remains.
...
, But I was wondering on what everyone's thoughts would be of adding the usf vehicle crews to main base (tire 0)
. This would allow usf with more options in the early game as well as some build diversity. (close ranged mini flanking unit/tank re-crewer)
Posts: 627
Posts: 2053
Posts: 2561
Posts: 818
 | Playercard of -NSO- Hon3ynuts | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Posts: 627
Why not, mabye people will try using armor company and the thompson upgrade if they actually have units to upgrade
Posts: 104
Posts: 952
Posts: 1158
T34/76 is NOT a joke on my hands; Maybe on your hands you make it suck shit? but on me, No. I can kill a stug with a little micro, go toe to toe with a Panzer 4. Is it a joke? LOL T34/85 is apparently a very good tank. But no one says it "one hit wipe" or elefant penetration; up to a point i think this little medium tank just have too much health and too much firepower with that fuel cost.
15 
Posts: 786
Posts: 1221 | Subs: 41
Posts: 1216
Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2
There is zero combat value in vehicle crews.
(if I'm right) Posts: 1216
Which, it is argued contrary to actual gameplay results, it somehow makes them less useless.
But you can give then Thompsons for 90 ammo
Posts: 1221 | Subs: 41
Imagine a circle jerk fest where AA halftracks run around the map and return to base for the "pit crew" of several vehicle squads repair them at a very fast pace.
That said, it might be much of a problem if they are found in later tiers. Tier zero? No way.
 |
|
|
47 | ||
 |
|
|
32 | ||
 |
|
|
21 | ||
|
|
|
|
16 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 | ||
 |
|
|
136 | ||
|
|
|
|
8 | ||
|
|
|
|
4 | ||
|
|
|
|
3 | ||
|
|
|
|
3 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
