its lol that scott has less health and armor then stug e..since they had mostly the same gun and weapon type/ usage...
If its lol that the StuG E has less more health and shorter range than the Scott, does that mean you like my proposal to nerf the StuG E’s health to that of the Scott and give it the range of the Scott so that the Scott no longer has lol less health?
The issue is behind keyboard here.
There is no evidence for this insult. If you disagree use a counter argument not insults as I don’t think the mod team balances things based on insults
You do realize stug e is doctrinal in non meta doctrine? And scott is stock unit that's supposed to be USF equivalent of rocket arty?
Obviously yes, you'll see one more then the other, but as vipper loves to say - just because unit isn't used doesn't mean its bad, in fact, it can be hidden OP.
There is no correlation between an ability being in a non meta doctrine and that unit being OP, in fact the opposite is true. A unit being in a non meta doctrine is evidence that that unit is contributing to that doctrine being bad, and being non meta as a result.
Also, it is in a meta doctrine, Mechanized assault. And yet it is still never built.
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
