State of the Soviets
12 Dec 2019, 07:55 AM
#262
Posts: 1527
Permanently BannedT34 85 needs to have slightly less AI. It's shells are basically on par with Sherman HE yet it does everything.
12 Dec 2019, 15:15 PM
#273
Posts: 951
Let's stay civil and on topic, thank you.
12 Dec 2019, 16:56 PM
#274
Posts: 311
T34 85 needs to have slightly less AI. It's shells are basically on par with Sherman HE yet it does everything.
True. T34/85 should be like a Panther, with almost zero dmg to Inf.
The 76 version should be the Inf killer.
Also, the hull machingun on both versions deal too much dmg, without any MU cost.
12 Dec 2019, 18:12 PM
#275
Posts: 1527
Permanently Banned
True. T34/85 should be like a Panther, with almost zero dmg to Inf.
The 76 version should be the Inf killer.
Also, the hull machingun on both versions deal too much dmg, without any MU cost.
Yeah I always thought 76 should be slightly better vs inf. I'm not asking for a panther level nerf to the 85 though
12 Dec 2019, 18:13 PM
#276
Posts: 379 | Subs: 1
I wish the Panther was a copy of the T34/85.
12 Dec 2019, 18:14 PM
#277
Posts: 72
True. T34/85 should be like a Panther, with almost zero dmg to Inf.
The 76 version should be the Inf killer.
Also, the hull machingun on both versions deal too much dmg, without any MU cost.
Can't really make any excuse for the T-34/85, but the 76 needs the good hull MG, otherwise there's no point in building it other than as a 90 fuel snare with its timing.
12 Dec 2019, 18:26 PM
#278
Posts: 1289
I wish the Panther was a copy of the T34/85.
It would be good at ai then and decent at AT.
But also loose 120 health, loose 100 armour, loose some range, loose heavy crush blitz and pintle mg.
But you would gain ram and capture territory, and the price would drop as well. Would be put in t3 as well leaving a gaping hole in t4. Putting all of current t3 to shame but would struggle a lot more vs td,s and heavies.
Late game t4 in an even worse state then now for ost lol.
Its almost as if the fuel you pay more for the panther now gets you some good really good stuff.
12 Dec 2019, 18:28 PM
#279
Posts: 1289
Can't really make any excuse for the T-34/85, but the 76 needs the good hull MG, otherwise there's no point in building it other than as a 90 fuel snare with its timing.
Yeah the main gun of the t34/76 is quite bad vs inf. Without the hull mg as it currently is the t34/76 would only excel vs light vehicles.
12 Dec 2019, 19:12 PM
#280
Posts: 379 | Subs: 1
It would be good at ai then and decent at AT.
But also loose 120 health, loose 100 armour, loose some range, loose heavy crush blitz and pintle mg.
But you would gain ram and capture territory, and the price would drop as well. Would be put in t3 as well leaving a gaping hole in t4. Putting all of current t3 to shame but would struggle a lot more vs td,s and heavies.
Late game t4 in an even worse state then now for ost lol.
Its almost as if the fuel you pay more for the panther now gets you some good really good stuff.
And also barely more expensive than Panzer IV and infinitely superior. Yeah, I'll take that trade.
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
125 | |||||
29 | |||||
1 | |||||
1 | |||||
65 | |||||
58 | |||||
16 | |||||
9 | |||||
1 | |||||
1 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.829222.789+35
- 2.34857.859+13
- 3.587233.716+3
- 4.1095612.641+19
- 5.882398.689+4
- 6.280162.633+8
- 7.996645.607+4
- 8.379114.769+1
- 9.300113.726-1
- 10.717439.620+1
Replay highlight
VS
- cblanco ★
- 보드카 중대
- VonManteuffel
- Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
9
Download
999
Board Info
710 users are online:
710 guests
3 posts in the last 24h
4 posts in the last week
23 posts in the last month
4 posts in the last week
23 posts in the last month
Registered members: 48722
Welcome our newest member, asherllc
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, asherllc
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM