Profile of Katitof

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/katitof


Thread: Some inconsistencies and Issues16 Jan 2016, 12:07 PM Comet AI so superior You should not post a vid of both fighting IS-2 frontally In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Jagdtiger '12.8 support fire' useless ability...16 Jan 2016, 11:23 AM Its a arty barrage ability. There isn't a single arty(not rocket arty) barrage ability that is accurate. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Revitalizing the Soviets and giving more Risk v. Reward16 Jan 2016, 10:36 AM Jump back to quoted post16 Jan 2016, 09:17 AMAustralian Magic Penals: - Very good at close range, useful at mid and long range. If only whole squad deals less long range DPS then 2 grens and barely more then single tommy model In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: OKW side tech16 Jan 2016, 09:32 AM Woooo side grades! Suggested this so many times and it finally comes No more cheapest, most effective teching with all the benefits In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: new AEC is overpowered15 Jan 2016, 23:49 PM Jump back to quoted post15 Jan 2016, 23:28 PMPancake Areolas Theres kind of a reason most people go med truck, because by going mech you put most of ur eggs into one basket. You are solely relying on a puma or luchs to pick up the slack of not being able to heal your infantry. Low health sturms and volks are pretty outclassed vs rifles and sections. Plus then you gotta buy the med truck as soon as possible to remedy this, then you have to go flak truck to be able to field tanks. Going mech requires you to fully tech up everything. Still delaying obers or armor, so jaegers or panzerfussiliers are almost necessary. Going med truck and mech only and solely relying on pumas and stukas is possible, but I dont see many people doing it. Also I read the lmg42 on the puma is bugged and does no damage currently. Forgot about aimed shot. Get on with the time... Current meta is mechanized into luchs, sturm med kits are enough to sustain yourself until bettlegroup is up, unless you're rushing AA HT there is no reason NOT to go for luchs with its current timing and power. Whatever you read about puma is wrong, it kills just as well as it ever did. Let me guess... 4v4 hero? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: new AEC is overpowered15 Jan 2016, 23:22 PM Jump back to quoted post15 Jan 2016, 23:14 PMPancake Areolas See with the puma, it does have more range, but AEC is general purpose and you don't give up healing going for AEC like you do going puma. If puma could fight infantry too I'd say it would be pretty OP considering it has 50 range and smoke. You don't give up anything going puma, you simply get healing bit later. However, brits do give up bofors for choosing AEC as well as they slow their tech down, whilst OKW just techs further. Pumas main cannon isn't really AI beast, but its coax have the strength of LMG42, its vet1 ability extremely easily picks out brit sniper and retreating units with last man. AEC fights infantry better, Puma fights armor better. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Revitalizing the Soviets and giving more Risk v. Reward15 Jan 2016, 23:08 PM I sound hysterical? Its not me who shit bricks the moment the sole thought of soviet non doctrinal infantry that would be able to not be steamrolled over long range occurs. Also, I'm avid pfussilier user, I know what they are capable of with and without sturm officer, suppression counters them better then it counters general infantry, they are powerful, but not overpowering and neither would be penals in that role. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Revitalizing the Soviets and giving more Risk v. Reward15 Jan 2016, 21:57 PM Jump back to quoted post15 Jan 2016, 21:44 PMPancake Areolas Considering penals get 60% better accuracy with vet, having oorah at vet 2 flamers, 6 men. And being better than a base rifle squad with garand profile. That sounds OP as fuck. Weaker AT support is a myth. Zis and su76s are not bad just because they aren't panthers. And if penals are squishy, then I guess most german inf is squishy too. 6 man rifles with flamethrower non doc is a terrible idea. Open ur eyes. And how OP sounds 6 men squad with grenadier(which is more then con DPS) DPS with ability to buy weapons for close/mid range and pretty good accuracy vet on axis side with allied weapons being designed to fight 4-5 men squads? Yet pfussiliers aren't OP. Plus, flamer could be replaced with DP or PTRS, hardly OP this way. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Revitalizing the Soviets and giving more Risk v. Reward15 Jan 2016, 21:40 PM Jump back to quoted post15 Jan 2016, 21:33 PMPancake Areolas Non doc flame rifles with 1 extra garand for 270 mp? Shit idea, im sorry. With no nades, no smoke, no AT capabilities, incomparably weaker tank support, weaker AT support, arriving on field much later and being much more squishy due to vet3 being nothing extraordinary defensively. Different armies, different units. What works with one, doesn't automatically mean it will work exactly the same way in another. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: ostheer teir 2 changes15 Jan 2016, 21:37 PM Way too many people greatly overestimate 222 capabilities... If it had correct scale we wouldn't have this problem. With its current scale, people tend to believe it was actually armored or well armed compared to allied heavy armored cars, while in fact it was barely any bigger then soviet M3. At the end, wrong scale makes people think it was some kind of light tank. In: COH2 Balance