Profile of Katitof

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/katitof


Thread: Brits need a heavy tank2 Mar 2016, 15:04 PM Jump back to quoted post2 Mar 2016, 12:45 PMvarunax The fact that they can build unlimited versions of slightly weaker Tigers that aren't locked behind a commander is already kind of ridiculous imo. It's like if you made Easy Eights stock and buildable without a commander. Or unlimited panthers! Oh wait... thats axis unit, it has all the rights in the world to be more powerful then anything that allies can build stock by a long shot, right? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: 222 spam2 Mar 2016, 14:46 PM Jump back to quoted post2 Mar 2016, 14:38 PMThamor Yes, but was answering his saying of why wc51 cost more than 222. That is rather terrible logic. Unarmed 250 costs 40 fuel. Soviet M5 costs 30. Some units just have retarded prices behind them that make absolutely no sense. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: 222 spam2 Mar 2016, 14:36 PM Jump back to quoted post2 Mar 2016, 14:34 PMThamor Doesn't wc51 allow transport of units? So you can make USF clown car out of it, if so it's balanced. Soviet M3 is still stronger and cheaper you know. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Sim City2 Mar 2016, 13:53 PM Jump back to quoted post2 Mar 2016, 13:47 PMIntelligence209 Ummm 2v2 is where it's most potent and wouldn't say meta but it's close son 1v1 is where M-42 is most potent. Most potent and actually valid against none scrub is a difference In: COH2 Balance
Thread: 222 spam2 Mar 2016, 13:17 PM Jump back to quoted post2 Mar 2016, 13:06 PMOsinyagov Luchs cost 65 fuel (if i remember correctly). It have good armor (not penetrated by rifles,mg and etc.), good cannon and have ~~320 hp~~ 400 hp (correct me if i made mistake). Also it can cloak at 1 vet. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Sim City2 Mar 2016, 13:13 PM Jump back to quoted post2 Mar 2016, 13:06 PMIntelligence209 Kk sim city and UKF emplacements balanced cuz you said so. I mean you are in the video game development industry and you do play everyday and you do watch all the tourneys so your right I'm wrong. Mod needs to lock the thread now, everything katiof says is right Is sim city meta in 1v1/2v2? No? Is it 4v4 scrubmode clusterfuck problem? Maybe. Thank you, end of topic. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Brits need a heavy tank2 Mar 2016, 12:54 PM You mean like... churchill or.. comet? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Vickers HMG: lower damage and increase suppression?2 Mar 2016, 09:32 AM Hardly. However it is a bit tiresome that cheaper equivalents of certain units perform better then their more expensive brothers with relic artificially trying to give them different role(suppression values vs penetration values and vet between the two, which goes completely down the shitter at vet1, because of incendiary rounds>>>UKF vet and stock penetration on vickers). Relic just tries to reinvent wheel over and over again and we end up with situation where more expensive unit performs or scales worse then cheaper equivalent from other army. I could understand if there was asymmetrical balance between the two like MG42 vs vickers vs maxim, but these two are practically identical in role and use with biggest difference being visuals and price. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: 222 spam2 Mar 2016, 09:24 AM Jump back to quoted post2 Mar 2016, 09:19 AMPorygon It is still a shit car, comparing to the PE one. Because relic tries to make it into some cheap ass light tank for poor people instead of giving is specific AI or AT role. It does both, which means it sucks in both, PE 222 couldn't scratch armor on anything bigger then jeep, but ripped infantry apart. Survivality solution was also superior with HP vet scaling regardless of vet you picked. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Comet or firefly against late game Axis armor2 Mar 2016, 08:26 AM Firefly if you plan on using any churchills. Comet if you don't. In: COH2 Gameplay