Profile of Katitof

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/katitof


Thread: t34/85 is a bit too cheap17 Jul 2016, 11:29 AM Jump back to quoted post17 Jul 2016, 11:26 AMOZtheWiZARD Is in that already the case? I haven't played single T-34-85 call in commander like in ages but I vaguely remember its price being 140 ish fuel for a single one. The reason double call in is cheaper is because you get a discount when you buy two. This applies to everything, even shreks. At least that's what Relic have said some time ago. The call-ins don't exist any longer for 34/85, they are T4 unit now and the price was lowered to not make it too steep or arrive too late compared to old call-in. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: PE is a good and fun faction in coh1, Why not add to coh2 17 Jul 2016, 10:53 AM Remove HMG, mortar, sniper and long barreled from Ost=PE. If you like CoH1 army better, you can always play coh1. In: Scrap Yard
Thread: su-85 needs high pop cost17 Jul 2016, 09:47 AM The buff was exclusively vs heavy tanks. Vs mediums it was 50% performance nerf. And it already got cost increase for that. I don't see any reason to nerf it in any way. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: on the ptrs17 Jul 2016, 09:46 AM Jump back to quoted post17 Jul 2016, 04:16 AMFiresparks except the upgrade on the conscript do give them a different PTRS entity than the guards. they used to give the same PTRS, but was made separate since it was too powerful on the conscript. The reason it was too powerful in the first place was removed long time ago, it was 40 dmg on inf and it destroyed team weapons. Con ptrs went on Relics traditional balance roller-coaster, from top, to the very bottom, because fuck small adjustments, huge revamps FTW, what can go wrong? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: on the ptrs16 Jul 2016, 18:37 PM Jump back to quoted post16 Jul 2016, 17:19 PMVuther It's definitely 27 vs. infantry. 27 vs inf 40 vs armor bonus of 13 always deals damage, giving PTRS "deflection damage" which actually makes it somewhat relevant vs meds. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: on the ptrs16 Jul 2016, 11:18 AM Jump back to quoted post16 Jul 2016, 11:00 AMpigsoup it is more accurate though right (against vehicles)? I am not sure about PTRS being bad... guards are in a good spot and i do not think Con PTRS commander's main problem is that con PTRS suck. I am afraid if we buff the weapon it might have bad influence on guards. Or we can just buff con PTRS accuracy and leave it there... Its not like cons already don't use "special glue eating ppsh" and "special glue eating PTRS" anyway. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: For F*** sakes Relic buff useless soviet units15 Jul 2016, 17:56 PM Jump back to quoted post15 Jul 2016, 17:55 PMWaegukin Its super depressing that it took this long for anyone to mention the M42 in a post about UP Soviet units. Because hardly anyone remembers it exists, that's how relevant it is In: COH2 Balance
Thread: For F*** sakes Relic buff useless soviet units15 Jul 2016, 17:35 PM M-42 KV-1 M3 conscript PTRS These are the only 4 things you can argue are too weak. Remaining ones, git gut son. @Grittle Guard PTRS yes, con PTRS shoots blanks. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Penal squads flamethrowers15 Jul 2016, 15:01 PM Jump back to quoted post15 Jul 2016, 14:56 PMstrafniki i used satchels against everything. only depending on your enemy. oh you. Exactly. I like to assume my enemy isn't in his first placement games. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Too much artillery?15 Jul 2016, 13:58 PM Jump back to quoted post15 Jul 2016, 13:51 PMd0ggY how do you know when you haven't played the game at all? Don't come with stats now. I've did it a lot of times i rekt Elefants with ISU. And with enough RNG on your side, soviet M15 is best AA in the game. Every unit have a lucky RNG streak once in a while, that still doesn't mean it suddenly counters its counters. In: COH2 Gameplay