Profile of Katitof

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/katitof


Thread: Tank Hunter tactics change13 Oct 2019, 13:29 PM I'd rather see ML-20 stay here, the doctrine doesn't have anything to push against stalemate, you could easily outcamp it and PTRS cons will obliterate any vehicle that dares to get in their range with nade assault. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: How are Infantrysections since patch?13 Oct 2019, 08:39 AM Jump back to quoted post13 Oct 2019, 08:33 AMachpawel Yes but it loses most, too, especially in with top players who win most with USF. That's, in my opinion factions issue/feature. In top level, player who puts pressure enough to lead the game has an advantage, ost is a reactive-defensive faction, they rarely can dictate the game and are built to respond to everything opponent does(therefore each tier comes with variety of units allowing you to counter everything you need to). And that isn't going to change. USF problem was identified and "fixed" by M20 change, so no idea why you're touching on that subject still. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: How are Infantrysections since patch?13 Oct 2019, 08:31 AM Jump back to quoted post13 Oct 2019, 08:09 AMachpawel Thanks for all nice links. The guy who made put so much effort and it is awsome. Still, if I understand correctly, ostheer has the worst results of all. Seems that's before latest patches, though. You understood wrong then. Ost has most players. I'd call 5% fluctuation from 50% WL pretty balanced. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Penals Redesign12 Oct 2019, 20:47 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Oct 2019, 20:37 PMachpawel Sorry my bad. Still you get merge, 6 men, and hoorah from t0. But it should be cheaper imo I guess. 50 manpower or sth like that. And you get squad that actually can fight before T3. Also, are you even aware that ost got bonus menpower over soviets at start? In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Can You Please Fix Churchill Crocs Rear Armor ?12 Oct 2019, 19:03 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Oct 2019, 19:00 PMSupport Sapper sure they are more expensive Not really, croc cost is in line with tiger, is-2 and pershing. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Can You Please Fix Churchill Crocs Rear Armor ?12 Oct 2019, 18:56 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Oct 2019, 18:53 PMDoomlord52 Both fair points, not sure how I missed the KT. Regardless, all other heavies had their rear-armor nerfed a while back to at most 140. Not all, only the ones with potent armament, KV series still enjoys relatively high rear armor, KV-2 lost its rear armor when it had its health increased and main gun massively buffed. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: How are Infantrysections since patch?12 Oct 2019, 18:53 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Oct 2019, 18:50 PMachpawel No - I'm much better with brits And it is so much more forgiving playing them. But I'll have to put some more effort into ost after patches - I'll report in a month or two No, you're not. If you were, your win ratio would be higher, proving your point. You have higher rank exclusively because of population distribution across factions, ost and soviets have most since they are here since day 1, while ukf is youngest and dlc locked faction, meaning least players play them. You simply have less players to compete with, therefore higher rank, remember that ranks are for the faction, not across the board. It was always the easiest to climb brit ladder due to lack of players in it. And inb4 you go there, yes, its confirmed, no guessing. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: How are Infantrysections since patch?12 Oct 2019, 18:35 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Oct 2019, 17:10 PMachpawel The whole faction is designed around all concepts that were asked for by ostheer players and rejected (close range grenade, 5th stock man gren squads, ability to build sandbags, heavy stock tanks, etc.) And yet, your win ratio with them is exactly the same as with any other faction you play. In fact, your playercard proves that game is perfectly balanced for average player. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Can You Please Fix Churchill Crocs Rear Armor ?12 Oct 2019, 18:31 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Oct 2019, 18:26 PMDoomlord52 What? Yes, the value does matter. Tanks were brought down from exactly 180 rear armor (and higher) because it was making flanking too unrewarding. That +40 rear armor over other heavies might not seem like a lot, but it actually is, since a TON of AT sources sit between 140 and 180 pen. And all of the tanks that got this treatment had very potent main guns that never bounced off of mediums. Jump back to quoted post12 Oct 2019, 18:28 PMdistrofio Why not nerf the main gun damage and its flame dots? If there is a reason for its armor then nerf other aspect of the unit Go read up on patch notes. Flamer was nerfed so hard in the past that main gun had to have its damage buffed to keep it at current cost. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Can You Please Fix Churchill Crocs Rear Armor ?12 Oct 2019, 17:27 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Oct 2019, 17:15 PMJilet So a "counter all" but don't be countered unit is well justified then ? If your army is 100% infantry focused and you never get anything more potent then P4 for AT, yes. In: COH2 Balance