Your bias is a hole in everyone's logic and common sense.
You've spelled "my" wrong.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Thread: OH Sniper2 Apr 2015, 11:46 AM
You've spelled "my" wrong. In: Lobby |
Thread: Over nerfed Obers2 Apr 2015, 11:25 AM
This is where you are right. Its pretty much the same on long range only. At close range its greater then rifles, so its even better then in his comparison. In: COH2 Balance |
Thread: OH Sniper2 Apr 2015, 10:40 AM
And up until now they had less hp then normal infantry. Another reason why it makes even less sense for one to have more. I find it pretty hilarious that you even try to defend sniper eating a rocket to the face. In: Lobby |
Thread: Is the King Tiger still worth 260 fuel?2 Apr 2015, 10:29 AM
Axis superiority complex. Unless he wants IS-2 to have better rate of fire, better chance to stun on deflect and much better accuracy against inf as well. In: COH2 Balance |
Thread: OH Sniper2 Apr 2015, 10:26 AM
I'm simply pointing a hole in your logic. 82 hp breaks the general infantry hp rule and makes it imbalanced. You say sov snipers are not vulnerable to the same situation. You couldn't be any more wrong here, they are in fact twice as vulnerable to mortar/pwerfer hits as the german sniper because they have half of the hp and stay on top of each other because of squad bunching, even if they are not on top of each other, the AoE area that is lethal to them is much greater then to ost sniper, which means AoE weapons are now much more deadly against them while axis sniper, as long as on full hp is pretty much immune to first hit. THAT is imbalanced. That is all the difference between 82hp and 80. That is why we have no longer 2% hp bulletins, because they were broken OP, just like the 2 extra hp on ost sniper already proves to be, making it THE most durable infantry unit in game against all 80dmg weapons, including rockets and mortar shells. That is what it is about. The 82 instead of 80 is simply plain retarded from gameplay point of view, not realism. In: Lobby |
Thread: OH Sniper2 Apr 2015, 10:13 AM
I don't understand how people think that a Katyusha rocket should have killed that sniper in the trending video. Cool, can we have infantry being immune to B-4 as well and while we're at it, lets make it so mines don't kill anymore, ok? You know, randomness, unfairness, logic makes no sense and stuff. In: Lobby |
Thread: 2v2s with the new patch2 Apr 2015, 09:23 AM
Allied versions of you doesn't really count. In: COH2 Gameplay |
Thread: PTRS now OP?2 Apr 2015, 09:18 AM
And all they had to do was give Guards SVTs. Which would fix nothing as PTRS would still be shit. But hey, I have great idea for fixing shrecks! Lets give volks G43s! So, that helps how again? In: COH2 Balance |
Thread: PTRS now OP?1 Apr 2015, 22:50 PM
PTRS are OP - thats the funniest and most ridiculos thing I have heard on this forum so far I see you don't read much alex posts then. In: COH2 Balance |
Thread: OH Sniper1 Apr 2015, 22:47 PM
Snipers doesn't deal any damage, they inflict instant death crit on infantry. The 82 makes no sense what so ever. 80, sure, but 82 is bordering on overpowered, the proof is few posts earlier and you still argue? ![]() It's not really much of an issue compared to say, the rest of the 1 shot squad wipe stuff that happens with Ostheer quite regularly. Gotta remember Ostheer investing a lot of MP into than 1 single man. It's loss is huge. It actually is when suddenly infantry starts to break fundamental infantry balance rules. Soviets also invest a lot of mp in their snipers, loss is also huge and they wouldn't stand a chance against a hit like that as aoe would blow them up. In: Lobby |
|
|
|
9 |
cblanco ★
보드카 중대
VonManteuffel
Heartless Jäger