Sic. Ahem.
Yes quite frankly, you of all people accusing others of being fanboys is fairly rich, you know. Pot, Kettle and stuff. Be that as it may:
Everyone is entitled to have an opinion of others. I'm not going to argue to change yours.
1: You don't play the game much, and it kinda shows. Want an example? IS2/ZiS vs Tiger/Pak might come down to RNG in the sterile theorycrafter environment, whereas in reality, Soviets have ceteris paribus more pushing power even in the lategame and will just drop flamearty on the Paks, flank them with Shocks, etc, just have more varied and more effective tools to take down OH support than vice versa. If you spend a tenth of the time you devote to harrasing people on those forums to actually play, you'd know that. In the competitive Arena, the guy with faction choice goes Soviets...
And yet, despite all of this(which I do account for, believe me), there are people like OP who argue 1v1 or 1v2+ doctrinal abilities scenarios in vacuum space in attempt to reinforce their already void point.
Also, soviets(USF as well and even OKW to a point, especially vs USF) allow for more aggression and we all know that aggressive play is always better then defensive as it is the aggressive player who sets the rules in general. Ost isn't as aggressive and in return they have to play in response for what opponent is doing instead of blindly following single BO, which their tech structure and unit selection accounts for. It doesn't mean they can't win, it doesn't mean they are weaker, it just means they are not the ones setting the rules for the skirmish.
2. Even if your points had more substance and would actually reflect the way this game tends to pan out in the contemporary meta, even if you were the goddamn second coming of Jesulin, your behaviour towards others would still be inacceptable. Quit being a dick 24/7. If you treated others in a real conversation the way you treat them here, sooner or later you'd be mighty lonely. If you think somebody cannot be convinced for whatever reason, just ignore them. I mean, do you seriously think "making fun out of (alleged) idiots" serves any other purpose than making you feel grand about yourself?
Well, its not a date forum, you don't have to love or like me. You've ever played against me or seen me on stream chats or even PM discussions, you'd knew my forum side is not an accurate representation of me.
I'm easily enraged by stupid arguments and people trying to push for buffs/nerfs just because its way out of their personal skill to utilize unit properly.
Make reasonable argument, you'll get reasonable answer.
Keep repeating whine thread about single unit regardless of how OP or balanced it is-well, don't expect anyone to treat you seriously and since my work allows me to spend quite some time at forums, engaging in discussions, I'm really tired of telling people the earth is round when they go against all evidence and claim its flat plate on the back of 4 elephants being carried through the universe by giant turtle.
We both know there is nothing wrong with Tiger cost effectiveness, we both know it never fights any other armor in 1v1 or 1vX scenario, unless you have overextended greatly and we both know there is only a single tank in whole allied arsenal, wins against a tiger in 1v1 shoot-out, yet there are still people trying to argue otherwise.
Always the same people.
Periodically.
0
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
