Profile of Katitof

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/katitof


Thread: [2v2] Fighting SU76s19 Aug 2015, 09:11 AM Pumas do well against T3 builds. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: M4 Sherman needs cost decrease 19 Aug 2015, 08:30 AM Jump back to quoted post19 Aug 2015, 01:24 AMBeefSurge Sherman's scale exponentially and have awesome synergy with literally every unit in the USF arsenal. P4 scales better. Hell, T34 scales better. USF tanks have absolutely worst scaling in game, which is sad considering they don't have any alternatives. Also, regarding 'exponentially' scaling. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Faction comparison by Relic19 Aug 2015, 07:46 AM Jump back to quoted post18 Aug 2015, 23:33 PMTrubbbel It's not impossible. Bazookas with an AT that has a wide arc and no need for sighting at vet 1 also with armor piercing goes a long way. Actually it is. You'll have your AT inf and ATGs wiped effortlessly by axis infantry and armor will roll over you. In: Lobby
Thread: State of USF18 Aug 2015, 19:23 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Aug 2015, 19:21 PMBeefSurge He's talking about M1 Garands, not Grenades. My bad, coffee worn off. In: Lobby
Thread: What to do with the MG34?18 Aug 2015, 19:20 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Aug 2015, 18:11 PMzarok47 Do tell the reasoning behind that. Axis have 6 men squads and allies have 4(even 3) men squads. Squad difference argument isn't valid for that reason and as you can see on the brit screenshots, brit sections are 4 men squads. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Bring back the SdKfz 221 Scout Car18 Aug 2015, 19:19 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Aug 2015, 18:27 PMPorygon I don't think standing at the middle of the map, 80% of time not moving, should count as scouting. If you can see them before they see you=successful scouting. Doesn't need to be mobile. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: State of USF18 Aug 2015, 19:19 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Aug 2015, 18:10 PMLemonJuice cool. at the end of the day though rifles still have higher dps thanks to the garands and vet The grenades have so long throw animation they could just as well be molos. Landing one is impossible on half aware player. In: Lobby
Thread: What to do with the MG34?18 Aug 2015, 17:22 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Aug 2015, 16:41 PMzarok47 Diffrence in DPS can be attribute to difference in sqaudsizes. This isn't valid argument since western front armies release and it will be even more irrelevant with release of brits. Also, .50 cal reinforces like a normal squad, for 35 mp per men, it doesn't have the 50% reinforce discount ANY OTHER SUPPORT WEAPON IN GAME FOR EVERY FACTION HAVE. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: What to do with the MG34?18 Aug 2015, 14:26 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Aug 2015, 14:22 PMAlexzandvar Nobody thinks Penals are fine, and they have nothing to do with the thread topic. You're arguing 210 mp unit should perform on pair to 240/260/280 mp unit. I've shown you that 10 mp difference makes for a huge performance gap. Comparison is more then relevant as it shows there is no logical reason why it would need improvement. Also, I've seen enough vet 3-5 HMG34s to say that it doesn't have problems vetting. Lower cost means also lower vet requirements. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: What to do with the MG34?18 Aug 2015, 14:18 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Aug 2015, 14:17 PMAlexzandvar I didn't ask for it to do more. But right now it's only 30 MP cheaper will doing a lot less. 30 mp is like 4 seconds of MP income. Penals are 10 mp cheaper then rifles. Want to compare their effectiveness? Hint: Penals are considerably weaker. Or compare cons to penals. 30 mp is quite a lot. In: COH2 Balance