Profile of Katitof

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/katitof


Thread: Penals22 Sep 2015, 19:07 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Sep 2015, 17:19 PMWFA_DoomTornado They beat grens, JLI, Sturmpios, Falls, Pgrens, Storms, ostruppen.... what else do you want. You to put the crack pipe down... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [OKW vs SOV] [1vs1] [SOV numerical advantage and doctorines]22 Sep 2015, 19:06 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Sep 2015, 18:13 PMThunderhun Number of soldier/squad is irrelevant since WFA and UKF... You've completely missed the point. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: American HMG in Trench Going Prone22 Sep 2015, 16:29 PM .50 cal is prone everywhere, because it have no standing/at wall stance like Maxim. In: COH2 Bugs
Thread: This automatch System HAS to be changed22 Sep 2015, 16:29 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Sep 2015, 16:20 PMPuppetmaster After 10 games with another Bear I got matched vs Jesulin and Milk. Doesn't get much worse than that Each time you play with new AT partner you are put in 10 placement games which are against all skill level players. It only makes sense. If you have won most of these 10 placement games, you'll be put in top 200, which means again, free for high skills to match you up with. Real skill level is determined pretty much after 20 games(10 placement and 10 "adjusting" games after placement). In: Lobby
Thread: Air Supremacy is just completely OP 22 Sep 2015, 14:53 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Sep 2015, 14:47 PMslother If Scavenge arty got tone down because it wiped USF base then Air Supremacy will get tonned down aswell. Case closed, We can all go home Scavange arty was QUITE LITERALLY an IWIN button. Air Supremacy doesn't grant you victory by annihilation 20 seconds after you click it. This is the fundamental difference. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: This automatch System HAS to be changed22 Sep 2015, 14:44 PM Hey lets beat a dead horse! No method of automatch will work if playerbase isn't large enough to sustain it across all skill levels. You might wait 3 hours for a game with your solution. Alternatively, you can play 1v1 or not play with randoms. In: Lobby
Thread: Air Supremacy is just completely OP 22 Sep 2015, 14:42 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Sep 2015, 14:38 PMslother Just run cheat mode and bombed USF base with 99999 muni scavenge doc arty ... it survived Well most of buildings got destroyed but it didnt got wiped. Then again it was 99999 muni worth scavenge (well i dont think there is much diffrence between 700 or 99999 muni one) +1 Budwise "at its prime" was in reference to its past performance, before additional shells were hard capped and the arty prevented from base use. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Penals22 Sep 2015, 14:36 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Sep 2015, 14:27 PMIron Emperor Perhaps give them a bit more KAPOW on close and close-mid range, would make them way more useful More KAPOW on close and close-mid range is exactly the reason why they are useless. You know who else have more KAPOW on close and close-mid range? Conscripts. PPSH conscripts. Partisans. Shocks. Assault guards. There is no reason nor the place for penals being effective at close and mid range, because so many other units that are either more effective, have more utility or simply more firepower for the cost at that range. Penals have no role, their utility is copied by CEs with flamers, satchels are unuseable as grenades and its better to make a demo trap then satchel garrison anyway. Penals only logical route of improvment is increase in long range DPS so soviets would have a squad that would actually be effective from fighting in cover over longer distances. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Air Supremacy is just completely OP 22 Sep 2015, 14:13 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Sep 2015, 13:58 PMKhan Rofl. So you're saying that because my opponent MIGHT go Commandos doctrine I should not utilize my trucks the way Relic intended them? And please don't put up a BS argument that they can be put in the base because if they were designed not to be deployed in forward positions, Relic would've restricted them to be deploy-able in the base territory. Jesus Christ Katitof, where does the bias end with you? No, I'm saying you need to reconsider that possibility and decide if its worth it for you. You know, the exactly same decision brits have to make before building emplacement or soviets before building ML-20 or B4. And please don't say that it costs 325 munitions so the end result is justified. That's equivalent to saying that a player who manages to float 700 munitions should be able to call in a nuke strike for auto win. FailFish I find this part extremely hilarious, because you've just described OKW scavenge doc arty at its prime against USF, one shooting whole USF base And brits aren't exactly muni floating army, forgo spending muni and watch yourself base locked. Additionally to that, I understand that you are in deep support of preventing stuka dive bomb from one shooting ML-20 and B4 as well as from incendiary round one shooting emplacements and forward assemblies for the balance consistency, because there is no reason why one should survive and another not as all of it are expensive investments that put a strain on the players economy. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Penals22 Sep 2015, 13:55 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Sep 2015, 13:52 PMjackill2611 Let them upgrade 2 flamethrowers for 120 muni - DONE. Done what? You'll end up with underperforming unit with 2 flamers instead of 1. And it still makes more sense to get 2 CEs with flamers instead. In: COH2 Balance