Profile of CookiezNcreem

Avatar Area

Offline United States
Posts: 3052 | Subs: 15

General Information
Register Time: 19 Dec 2013, 18:31 PM
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/CookieZR6
Website: http://steamcommunity.com/groups/USFOPCOH2/members
Steam: 76561198094724817
Residence:

United States
Nationality:

United States
Timezone: America/Indiana/Knox
Game Name: CookiezNcreem

Show Latest Posts


Thread: Partisans are utter garbage20 Dec 2014, 18:09 PM camo and hold fire would go a long way In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Rear echelons in fighting positions negative cover18 Dec 2014, 21:19 PM Youre technically in red cover because the fighting position is,and therefore so are the RE's themselves,i wouldnt worry about it being bad for the RE's though,probably just a visual glitch. In: COH2 Bugs
Thread: OKW, the root of most balance issues?15 Dec 2014, 01:47 AM Obers need to be powerful for the OKW since without them they would just get raped and shit on afterwards by Inf blobs/med tank trains from both allied factions with or without the flak HT or stuka, lets be real. BUT they dont have to be so over-the-top easy mode Amove and forget squad wipes machine that they are now,Hell they even challenge light vehicles in some cases. I +1 to nerfing LMG34 and buffing their k98, make obers like falls. including obers losing that lame received accuracy. They ARE human beings relic..theres no reason they should dodge aimed shots any better than anyone else unless they use cover like everyone else has to...at least until vetted... nor should they be able to terminator spray with their LMG with such accuracy at a distance... and theres a reason people dont blob falls/volks the same way they do obers/volks. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: why no sniper in us army ?9 Dec 2014, 21:18 PM GIVE PATHFINDERS ASSASINATE ABILITY FROM AA CAMPAIGN PLEASE In: Lobby
Thread: M36- badly underpowered?8 Dec 2014, 13:34 PM Jump back to quoted post8 Dec 2014, 12:15 PMAustralian Magic Im still waiting for someone to explain me how should I chase almost dead heavy tank to finish it with my Jackson if its retreating behind schrecks, paks and stuff like that IS2, ISU, Panther, Ele, JT, KT, Tiger don't have such problem in most cases. Just go forward, shoot 2 times, get few shots at front and reverse. US Forces tanks are like go forward, shoot once (bounced), get 2 shots and die. Get a train of about 3-4 shermans and jacksons and rifles and call a p47 then send kitchen sink hoping to knock it out in one big epic assault..if you fail well it is what it is. lol In: COH2 Balance
Thread: M3 Halftrack7 Dec 2014, 22:31 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Dec 2014, 18:25 PMJorad Maybe but now M3 Halftrack is kind of a one shot if you loose it ok no more M3 Yet the Russian have an elite guard squad with PPSH in their Land Lesee commander exactly...as if the germans would have trouble killing it at that point in the game. In: US Forces Strategies
Thread: M36- badly underpowered?7 Dec 2014, 17:33 PM I think allowing it to spot for itself with a somewhat expensive tank commander upgrade/toggle would be very nice too,it IS open topped. Same with the M10. And when its using this upgrade/ability it moves slower,like su85 And also has a commander appear and look around with his binoculars for eye candy In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Where Company of Heroes went wrong.7 Dec 2014, 17:29 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Dec 2014, 16:51 PMspajn What i hate about Relic is they innovate new army designs for the simple reason of innovating. For Relic its worth it if gameplay takes a backseat as along as new armies are radically different than the older armies. Relic could learn a thing or two from Blizzard when they say "GAMEPLAY FIRST". Pretty much :/ In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: M36- badly underpowered?6 Dec 2014, 15:15 PM Jump back to quoted post6 Dec 2014, 06:04 AMJaigen And my opinion of your skills and thus the worth of your input has even lowered further, an the tragic part is you dont even know why. Except no one really cares about your opinion of my skills. This thread(just incase you're under the influence or just stupid)is about the M36 and how its not trash at its role of supporting tank destroyer if you can support it/micro it properly. Which is what I wrote. Which is what others have written.(including top 10 players...) I also wrote that it could use a buff as well. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: M36- badly underpowered?6 Dec 2014, 02:53 AM Jump back to quoted post5 Dec 2014, 22:34 PMJaigen And the trend of allied players not wanting to use combined arms continues. Uh no...i simply wrote that i'd rather have M10's than jacksons nondoctrinally.....which is assuming they'd be used together with shermans as stated by my "Get 2-3 shermans first" comment.. And when i was talking about critical mass i was referring to the fact that 3-4 shermans can simply do more than 3-4 jacksons. Since the jacksons are only decent at one job...unlike shermans which are decent/good at many jobs....since it is a workhorse medium tank after all.... ...are you trolling or what? In: COH2 Balance