Profile of CookiezNcreem

TIME TO KICK SOME OKW ASS BABY!!!!!!!!!!! NO MORE STUPID OBERS !!!!!!!NO MORE OP STUPID PANTHER !!!!!!!!!

KT HIDE NOT SO THICK ANYMORE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
HOOAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH


ITS TIME USF PLAYERS. ITS TIME!!!!!! UNLEASH ALL THAT FRUSTRATION!!!!!!REVENGE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!CHANT WITH ME !!! USA USA USA USA !!!!!!

Team games are no more or less balanced than 1v1 when both sides are of equal skill. Do you think IS2 magically becomes shit in 2v2? Does the Sherman magically do less damage? Do cons stop being spammable?

The only reason people think team games are less balanced is because match making in this game is terrible and will put good players against bad players or good ones with bad ones.

The "I could win even with a shit doctrine versus a noob" isn't an argument, in any game mode you can beat a noob with trivial effort.

And what's funny Is almost all of your ATs are in placement games.

The IS2 is good in 1v1. It's damn good in 2v2 when 2 sovs can spam them against a double OKW, it's also REALLY good with a Jackson behind it.

Units become exponentially weaker or stronger and their perks change based on the mode. A 1v1 katyusha is not a 4v4 katyusha, buddy. Do I really have to explain this to you?

I don't throw out wrong stats, and the comparison of FP to the Schwer is that you have the non-doctrine option to make defensive emplacements. USF gets a bunker equivalent and OKW just gets a big flak truck because they have no defensive emplacements at all.

I don't "love" OKW, but people love to screech with out understand in the inherent weakness in each of the factions. See: people constantly disregarding OKW's lower fuel income.

And if you want to talk about talking about what you play, you have barely any games as OKW yet seem to talk like you have perfected how to play it and win every time.

sandbags with an MG behind it is a defensive emplacement. Not a bunker by game definition but it is. Soviets can have a con squad behind sandbags. You probably don't see that in the 5v5 bs you play on the daily, but that it is a defensive position and damn hard for axis to crack early on.


I'm pretty sure I've played against top 10 OKW, and OKW of all kinds at least 100 times. I know how they work. I watch all my 1v1 replays, mostly from my opponents perspective.

How many times have you played anyone of any skill,without your mates covering every dumb mistake you probably make? Let me answer that for you, NEVER

Except that Allied early game strengths derive entirely from the fact Volks cannot out scale or out DPS mainline allied infantry till the Volks squad in question hits Vet 3. Stop ignoring the fact that Volks cost less MP and popcap, but they preform worse, this is how the entire game is designed.

Are Soviets now 2OP because cons are easier to reinforce and produce than Grens?

LMG rifles and Paras are not useless when Obers come out, because you have enough LMG's to ruin his day still. The Luchs will come around the same time your producing your first medium to counter it, so just chase it off when it gets to close. Or make an AT gun, or drop one in, or give one of your Rifles 2 zooks to shoo it away.

The Schwer doesn't "map lock" any harder or earlier than USF can with FP spam, which if you haven't tried is quite fun and extremely good at establishing and keeping map presence. OKW has the Schwer because it has no defensive emplacements like USF and Ost do, and no demos like Soviets do.

Yeah next to OKW soviets aren't exacly struggling to win in any mode vs any faction

Cons spam will destroy everything Ost has early on and the only reason sovs don't do it to OKW Is overs and T4 flak.

Don't folks get a received accuracy buff at fucking vet 1? Or are you gonna throw more DPS notes at me?

So should I get MOAr moar moar LMG?? or plant enough M6 mines to not get all my rifles impaled with 20mm rounds? A Sherman will NOT come out at the same time as a Lucas unless the American had won already. And even then you are floating enough that you can get a luchs,double raks, and obviously your shriek blob so yeah please chase that Luchs, lose your Sherman,and fall even more behind.

ONE PUMA OR EVEN A FLAK HT will destroy any number of fighting positions with impunity. Keep posting shit, and while you're at it wipe off your fingers and enter key with some baby wipes.

I don't know why I even attempt to have a real discussion with you..even now to this day NOT ONE 1v1 RECORDED

The P2 can win games if they're isn't enough AT or it avoids a mine and wipes multiple squads on retreat. So not being able to get a panther a few mins later is irrelevant if you are forced to give up the flanks or lose all your infantry.

And rifles lose to folks in the big picture because there are more volks than rifles and volks have the benefit of retreating to a damn fortress to further dominate rifles for their cost,

Once they vet,even a little bit,t they can resist even LMG rifles until other numerous squads arrive to help

unless they spend muni and fuel ON DOUBLE BARS(because one has no noticeable effect)which makes them cost disproportionately more. And then obers shit all over that mechanic

DPS comparison is a fucking lie unless you're fighting in a vacuum. just having a 1v1 gun fight at range with both in proper cover will take ages for rifles to win unless there both standing in red cover looking each other in the eye and smellin each other's breath. Which doesn't happen. Unless it's Stalingrad or something similar. Hats the only time rifles truly dominate anything. Losing 2-3 models and health and not being able to fight the inevitable next squad is not dominating anything.

sturms are well balanced because they beat rifles when used properly and with skill and ability usage, and get murdered when used idiotically with no brains like Volks are used 90% of the time.
You also bleed thanks to reinforce cost.