I guess the meta for 2v2 would be germans: PAK43 commander + offmap artillery + recon commander. Now PAK43> Elefant, so many people will use it(or at least me) to have advatange over its big range ^^
US probably will use Airborne company and soviet would use IS2 or T34/85 as always. |
Thread: ISU-15223 Jun 2014, 11:40 AM
Tiger vs ISU? No problem, guards button + AT nade, gg. |
I have to disagree, to me the ML20 is ultra accurate, it happened to me in a game, ask Aerohank, every shell it fired, 4, it landed on to something, pak40, sdkfz250, or mg42, I find it superior than the lefh18, for sure. |
 dat spoiler, |
Lol I agree with this idea, may add a little fun  |
I played these guys yesterday, And me and my mate managed to beat them early and mid game, but late game ISU came and voilá vet 3 infantry squads wiped out, elefant? no problem ISU + Mark Target = dead. |
Easy.
Lots of respect to the good players tho!
(Let us celebrate our victory )
You know, saying easy to the opponents...is not very respectful, lol |
Be real, please. My text is direct, no passive aggression required.
This is a text based medium, nobody can see you rolling your eyes or whatever else crap you are doing as you type your "sarcastic" and barbed prejudicial ad hominem, nor cares about it.
Act like a bitch, and you will get regarded like one. Your choice, really.
Say what you mean, and mean what you say. Afterall, that is what language and communication is for.
No need to hide behind some farcical social filter, which is ultimately self-defeating anyways.
The majority doesnt give a damned about some veiled snarkiness, they just want content.
If you cant provide that, and have only the former, then perhaps you shouldnt post in the first place.
Nobody cares about how butthurt you are. Only about topic relevant discussion.
I issued some advice to the poster in question, because I think that is conducive to the poster he wants to be, and can be.
You attack me for that. Why? Some issue of your own, which frankly interests me not at all, and the readers of this thread, even less.
I agree, Sherman is a bit underpowered  |
What makes you think its long range?
Panzerfaust also could be shot further then AT nade could be thrown you know.
I thought that because its a rifle ATnade...I thought it would have same range as smoke nade, lol |
Riflemen has long range motor break-up to any vehicle? WTF? |