Profile of VonIvan

Avatar Area

Offline United States
Posts: 2487 | Subs: 21

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/VonIvan
Twitter: https://twitter.com/EXPERTSVonIvan
Steam: 76561198012811763
Residence:

United States
Nationality:

United States
Game Name: EXPERTSVonIvan

Show Latest Posts


Thread: Balance Preview Update 09/09/201511 Sep 2015, 14:05 PM Jump back to quoted post10 Sep 2015, 21:13 PMNabarxos any more USF changes? In: Lobby
Thread: Should the USF AT gun recieve a buff?10 Sep 2015, 20:16 PM AP rounds aren't the problem.(you can get those for 30 munis). The problem is how easily the USF at-gun is wiped by literally everything. It should factor in as green cover or something to allow it to take shots like a pak can from inf. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Lose through syncerror10 Sep 2015, 17:37 PM It's a feature. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Balance Preview Update 09/09/201510 Sep 2015, 17:36 PM Jump back to quoted post10 Sep 2015, 17:02 PMnigo Balance Preview Update 09/09/2015 Partisan cost reduced back to 210 now that they do less damage Fixed an issue with partisans not camouflaging properly That it? In: Lobby
Thread: Pak40 to T1 - it's needed.10 Sep 2015, 17:30 PM Jump back to quoted post10 Sep 2015, 16:38 PMRifleman89 Please point to me where I called Allies OP in my thread? Never said it, was making the point that at the moment it appears all Axis have is a Reactionary playstyle aand we can't be proactive, knowing what's coming. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jump back to quoted post10 Sep 2015, 16:18 PMRifleman89 At what point do the Allies need to be reacting to their opponent's gameplay as much as Axis has to react to theirs? It appears to be pretty one sided at the moment. Playing constant CATCH-UP REACTION is destroying Axis play and it isn't L2P - we don't have the tools we need early enough to put up a good fight. The Allies have the choices that effect the rest of the game and the mobility advantage in most areas of the game. And with the way the QF 6 lber is working for its price, a reduction around 290-300 is warranted for the Pak 40 as well, IMHO. It's pretty high priced comparatively and it's vet1 ability needs to allow for a higher price but not its current level. The Axis counters to the early Allied play are quickly obsolete or already easily countered themselves. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Balance Preview Update 09/08/201510 Sep 2015, 16:41 PM Jump back to quoted post10 Sep 2015, 14:55 PMBen Affleck If they nerf the Crocodile I want my money back. Spam Relic's HR department. In: Lobby
Thread: Pak40 to T1 - it's needed.10 Sep 2015, 16:32 PM Paging Dr. Cruzz. Dr. Cruzz to the allies OP thread. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Quinn duffy's 5 year plan and War Spoil Extravaganza 10 Sep 2015, 16:09 PM Jump back to quoted post10 Sep 2015, 05:24 AMBartonPL 5 year plan? sounds like communism is back In: Lobby
Thread: Love it or Hate it ?9 Sep 2015, 16:02 PM Like the faction, hate the balance. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Balance Preview Update 09/08/20159 Sep 2015, 02:47 AM Jump back to quoted post8 Sep 2015, 17:41 PMnigo http://community.companyofheroes.com/forum/company-of-heroes-2/company-of-heroes-2-general-discussion/67-coh-2-changelog?p=207570#post207570 Balance Preview Update 09/04/2015 Partisan cost increased from 210 to 250 to bring the unit in line with its cost. Partisan guns changed from MP44 to MP40s (PPSH for placeholder) they will deal slightly less damage but still be good at dealing with weapon teams Partisans now have camouflage to gain extra utility after their initial deployment T34 Population increased from 8 to 10 to prevent overwhelming numbers of the tank As if AT partysans were bad enough(reinforce wise). Now this. Someone explain to me why partysans are getting changed for the worse rather than the better. And the t-34/76 changes. Mass producing them vs hordes of panthers/p4s/at-gun/at-inf/etc....yet they decide to do this. For something that can't scale for ****. In: Lobby