Profile of elchino7

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2

General Information
Steam: 76561198076231535


Thread: 17th Sept Patch impressions - post here17 Sep 2015, 23:26 PM Jump back to quoted post17 Sep 2015, 23:17 PMJadame! No idea but since they are 3 man they cant cap team weapons =\ And always run off in attempt to finish healing. I better stick to engies for capping and use tommies for healing. They just need the ambulance treatment. In: Lobby
Thread: Relic: Balance Feedback Guidelines17 Sep 2015, 22:48 PM Move to lobby and i would love seeing this implemented for the balance section. Gameplay and Lobby obviously are spared from this. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: 17th Sept Patch impressions - post here17 Sep 2015, 22:45 PM RNG gods please drop me Rifle company! In: Lobby
Thread: Allies synergy vs Axis synergy17 Sep 2015, 19:25 PM Jump back to quoted post17 Sep 2015, 04:43 AMRemo 1v1 and 2v2 is pretty close to being balanced, at least it will be with the 17th patch. As for 3v3/4v4 Axis firmly hold those, definitely 4v4. As of now, random Allies > random Axis due to Jump back to quoted post17 Sep 2015, 05:33 AMpigsoup hmm. with brits in the equation, i'd say allies definitely have more synergy and stronger. mainly because of individually ridick brit op shit units. like current croc. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW MP Float17 Sep 2015, 19:20 PM Theres something called cache. http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:UdCj8P0Lo2wJ:www.coh2.org/topic/40391/dec-s-state-of-the-game-review+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=ar Stop spamming threads. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Centaur17 Sep 2015, 17:28 PM Jump back to quoted post17 Sep 2015, 15:20 PMFul4n0 just asking, no other reasons here but....why it is OK than an IS2 or a Tiger decrew or even destroy an ATG, but it is not fair if a centaur does the same??? again, just asking, just want to know the reasons, I am not trying to say that centaur is OK because IS2 and Tiger but I want to know why is different. Timing: one unit appear at 10-12. The other on the late game. Centaur will contest at most 1 at gun by that time. Speed: both from the units and the time it takes to decrew consistently an at gun. You have to pray to RNGesus for the IS2 (or upgrade the gunner and get close) and it takes some shots with the Tiger to do so. Cost: related to timing also. Pen and AI are really good on the Centaur. Either the Ostwind is overpriced or the Centaur overperform or is underpriced (and i think the Ostwind is fine). In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Some thoughts on Sep 17th patch.17 Sep 2015, 17:07 PM Jump back to quoted post17 Sep 2015, 15:30 PMBlalord ... I'm not sure if this proves the point: been able to sustain 2 Churchill when the only AT is a JPIV and a single rak which gets kills when the 2nd Churchill appears. Regarding the replay: -Zoobee is the alt of some player? -Questionable 3 SP opening, which backfired later on. It could had been worst if no missmicro on the Bren flamer. -Centaur punish his build badly. -12min+ zoobee starts to float munition. BADLY. Brens and Piat would had tilt the game. Still chance for both. -Constant trade from snipers and Falls. SO MANY FALLS in this game. -19: GG 400muni float He could had ended the game here -23: small victory for Spanky and smart use of muni for Falls (since he was down really bad mp wise) -30: either PIV or PV would had been better? Infantry wise he was doing fine. An extra rak at some point wouldn't had hurt. His JPIV + whatever tank would had contested a Cromwell and Churchill. Still anybodies game at this point. -38: lost of vet2 rak. His only AT against 2 Churchills and Cromwell is a single JPIV -40: miss micro with JPIV GG. Jump back to quoted post17 Sep 2015, 14:29 PMJohnnyB snip Read above. You should really watch the replay. Jump back to quoted post17 Sep 2015, 14:28 PMRMMLz "Spanky is noob" threads and posts incoming. More like playing with a different build against "meta". In: COH2 Balance
Thread: 2XISG prevents people from enjoying COH2 or buying the UKF17 Sep 2015, 03:57 AM I see 3 threads regarding ISG on the same page. Forum performance improvements: Several optimizations were made that improve the forums quality. We want to encourage certain users to make thread with higher standards in order to rise the level of discussion. Reduce DeC ~~RoF~~ thread creation from ∞ to 1 per week. We are looking to minimize the heavy attrition cause by this unit allowing others users to have more time to prepare between each thread. We hope this will improve the readability of the balance section. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Centaur OP17 Sep 2015, 03:50 AM Jump back to quoted post17 Sep 2015, 00:11 AMDeC That's the point. Against the btits you should easily dominate and own 3/4 of the map for a good 10-15 minutes. I figure it out that on teamgames, you can rely on SU or USF to do that for you. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Centaur OP16 Sep 2015, 23:54 PM Jump back to quoted post16 Sep 2015, 21:01 PMDeC That's only possible if you pickup luftwaffe fuel supply drops. How much fuel does UKF start with? UKF: 30 + 115 - (x) = 145 in tech. (x) been initial fuel 100 for the Centaur / 110 for Cromwell 15/15/25 Upgrades (Nade/Rack/Bolster) OH: 170f in tech (accounting for initial fuel) 100 for Ostwind / 125f PIV SU: 170f in tech (accounting for initial fuel) 80f for T34 25/25 Upgrades (Molo/AT nade) 23f average for a 50/50 control map (4SP + 1fuel + Base). Should you add 1/2 cache, have a better presence on the map and you can put out a 10-12 min Centaur without problem. Nade (which is a lackluster upgrade) should be fused with Bolster and Tank tier could be 10-25f more expensive (tech is gonna be -5f next patch) In: COH2 Balance