Still have risk, and if the Ostheer player half awake, you cannot wipe the PG out.
I would choose to engage the PG with 2 cons and 1 more at his retreat route and wipe them out.
3*240MP versus 360MP ? 2xPG wipe your 2*cons with your 1 more.
1 PPSH give only 6 DPS more and make consripts usable in middle and late game. Grens for this dont need doctrine.
Could you kindly re-read the entire message? I know I'm making a subtle point here, you might not be able to keep up. Also, a vet 2 PPSH will now beat a no-vet Pgren.
Vet 2 Pgren beat Shock troops. StG44 (MP44) have double dps versus PPSH on close. I dont understand hystery about 3xPPSH.
i think the problem is conscripts can be spammable, and you need 2 gren to deal 1 ppsh conscript if you want 100 % win(not included german grenades)
In team games you never build more then four constripts. OST have mostly two grenadiers with lmg42 and two pz grenadiers. OST players simply run into scripts as how they were used in past. With both units is this wrong.
In 1v1 this can be problem, but in team games I seem alright.
Yes, is weak. Peoples who insult T-34/85, will write soon "it should be weaker, because it does not need teching". I dont think it.
Stugg E need barrage for 60 muni.