Profile of Omega_Warrior

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 2561

General Information


Thread: ESL cup statistics20 Feb 2016, 07:36 AM Jump back to quoted post20 Feb 2016, 04:59 AMbroodwarjc It is probably best to start fresh and see if the AEC and 222 changes affect those factions win rates at all with a fresh set so you can compare patch to patch. Don't forget actually functioning vet In: Lobby
Thread: Concerned about 222 price20 Feb 2016, 06:52 AM Jump back to quoted post20 Feb 2016, 06:30 AMHans G. Schultz The AEC's AT capabilities weren't nerfed, so that shouldn't change anything. The 222 scout car still has paper armor, and a not-so-powerful/accurate gun. I feel like a lot of players opinions of 222s comes from only dealing with one at a time. Have two 222s shooting at the same target and they'll kill them just as quick as a T-70. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Bug - UK Sandbags and Trenches19 Feb 2016, 23:11 PM Jump back to quoted post19 Feb 2016, 22:14 PMCaptain QQ I know this is cheesy but you can always shoot it. You get a crosshair over it and everything with infantry. Im not saying I am in favor of it but it is one way to deal with it. The problem is you can't get rid of it in an appropriate amount of time. It would be mostly fine if the infantry can just take a couple of shots at it to knock it down, but as is they take much longer to destroy then to build. In: COH2 Bugs
Thread: Concerned about 222 price19 Feb 2016, 21:41 PM Well hopefully Relic knows what they are doing. But I know my build first game of the new patch MG>pio>MG>pio Secure fuel, quick quick tech to T2, then 222>222>222>pgren>pgren and then use all my munitions on mines, maybe a bunker or two I'm sure I could wipe a couple of squads on the retreat before they even realize what's happening. And all those mines will help secure my territory while my 222s and pgrens create a highly mobile death squad. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Concerned about 222 price19 Feb 2016, 21:27 PM I don't want to be one of those players claiming OP before patch is out. Hell I have suggested 222 buffs in multiple threads. But multiple 222s is one of my favorite wher strats, and it was always underrated. You'd be suprised how quick 3 222s can focus down a squad and just how much mobility this strat provided. And from first hand knowledge I think I'm right to be concerned about what they could do without their cost being adjusted a little. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Concerned about 222 price19 Feb 2016, 21:12 PM Jump back to quoted post19 Feb 2016, 21:04 PMFestiveLongJohns One thing to keep in mind is that building 3 222s takes a lot longer than producing one vehicle, and the longer the game goes the smaller the window of effectiveness for the 222 becomes. I could see the brits having an issue against a 222 rush, but the usf and soviets have plenty of options to deal with them. 1. Building 222s can also start much earlier. As long as the player doesn't wait, they could build 3 222s before anything but a m20 and AEC. 2. The same could be said about all light vehicles. 222s do have late game versitility as a scout though if they attain vet. 3. Only if they tech correctly. If they go tier 1 or liutenant odds are they likely won't be able to accumulate enough ammo for nades an zooks to counter 2-3 222s whose combined health is now 640-960. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Concerned about 222 price19 Feb 2016, 21:00 PM The 222 definitely needed the health buff that it got. But I'm quite worried about the fact that the price was not adjusted at all. At only 15 fuel, the 222 is extremely cheap and I think this might lead to 222s being spammed too quickly for the allied players AT to deal with them, while not really delaying whermacht tech compared to other light vehicles. For comparison, 3 222s will only cost 600 something manpower and only 45 fuel, yet will likely beat every allied light vehicle. All while delaying their tech less then the other light vehicles. (Also the M20's price looks ridiculous compared to the 222) In: COH2 Balance
Thread: FEBRUARY 25TH UPDATE - RELEASE NOTES19 Feb 2016, 20:07 PM Jump back to quoted post19 Feb 2016, 19:34 PMRocket AGREED REVERT PATHING BACK TO HOW IT WAS!!! they only want to drive in reverse They did. You just don't know how to read patchnotes. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: FEBRUARY 25TH UPDATE - RELEASE NOTES19 Feb 2016, 17:13 PM Jump back to quoted post19 Feb 2016, 15:51 PMIA3 - HH limit all rocket artillery units to only 2 available(pwerfer, katiusha, colliope, ...) limit all howitzers to only 3 increase MP for all main inf units reduce Fuel cost for all non doc tanks relic must learn somethings from coh 1 Nobody but you thinks that is a good idea. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: New commander ability - Counter barage19 Feb 2016, 17:04 PM He also showed that the bases counter-barrage had a range that didn't cover the entire map. If the player had built the howitzer just a little further back he would have been out of range. Not to mention it will be a lot less useful on larger maps. In: COH2 Balance