Profile of Papinak

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 53

General Information


Thread: Worse patch in history !!24 Aug 2013, 11:42 AM To Raw: Damage is nearly the same cuz 20mm cannon on AC just didnt kill a shit, believe me I used them a lot. Also by the time you see vanilla AC on the field you have time to tech to AT nades in case that 20mm cannon will kill your men as you say, it is the same story as with Flame HT. AC is already super fragile, one AT nade and it is dead so better damage by small arms fire will make it useless as it was before the patch (I mean upgraded AC). It can be more vulnerable to Maxim fire maybe, but thats about it. German early AT is exactly the same as Soviets. The only difference is that Soviets have to tech to have it while German have to tech and build T2 building to field something you can use AT nades on. What is your problem with that, it is working as intended. You either play it save with AT nades and or Guards or risk it with fast T70. It is your choice and this game is pretty much about it: high risk may come with high reward but also can cost you a game. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Worse patch in history !!24 Aug 2013, 09:45 AM Jump back to quoted post24 Aug 2013, 08:33 AMraw No, but they can now kills things pretty handily. Yes, Einstein. The difference between before the patch and now is that the 222 can potentially end the game and not every soviet opener has AT nade before 5min. Well, now they have to. You are just wrong. AC could ran into yr base before the patch and kill units in the same way like it does now. If he is parked near your HQ, you can call in Guards to kill it or wait a sec till AT nade is up and kill it after. I dont know about you but I always made AT nades right after molotov cuz every Ost player send Flame HT against me and I needed AT nade to survive that. NOTHING HAS CHANGED. And to the AC change. You put 70 so much needed muni to make it complete useless against infantry and when guards jumped into M3 also against M3 itself. Do you think AC with upgun was usefull? It is sort of glass cannon right now but it is so F fragile that it is balanced. I have lost many ACs to stupid 35muni mines while trying to kill SU imba snipers and this was and still is balanced? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: My opinion on the units post patch.24 Aug 2013, 07:06 AM I am not sure on numbers here but SU76 should be ZIS AT gun on wheels with muni free barrage, right? So it is not that bad unit but why would you buid it instead of almighty SU85? It needs some kind of wow factor to convince people to build them. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Soviet Sniper Fixed ?24 Aug 2013, 06:41 AM Lets not forget that SU snipers has flares, which is basically nondoc recon run with lower price. It can be very deadly esp. with heavy mortars usage since there is no chance to destroy the flare. Ost sniper on the other hand is complety rubbish for his price and has no added value like SU one. Also his Vet1 ability is not that great either. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Worse patch in history !!24 Aug 2013, 06:35 AM Jump back to quoted post24 Aug 2013, 04:51 AMFestiveLongJohns ...you can rush an Ostwind and really punish the soviet with no real counter until he can get an SU-85 out... The answer is new T34, just try it out. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: What I view as very pressing issues22 Aug 2013, 16:55 PM The argument that MG42 backed up with Grens or another MG42 can deal with M3 counter just fine is wrong. If Ost player is FORCED to sacrifice 480mp and capping power to hold 1 or oven 2 points, than you are still winning cuz you just can simply go cap somewhere else. You can also build 2 or even 3 M3 and his MG and Gren is dead without chance to survive while retreating. T1 and T2 have both hard and soft counters to MG42 and it is not just M3 with flamers. If Ost player stay too long in T1 to try to slowly recapture map or try to pin you in yr base, you can simply fast tech to T70 and he is screwed. On some maps it can be issue but hey, you dont have to play them anymore. What is imho IMBA is MG pin bulletin but thats about it. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Patch Notes 20/08/201321 Aug 2013, 20:43 PM To raw: I play team games (not only COH2 but in general) only with friends so I dont have yr POV but my point stands still. It can be "balanced" in that way that AT team can be matched up against random players with higher skill to "compensate" AT vs nonAT issues. However what I know for sure from vCOH 2v2 random ladder is that many of those high level players (lets say 14 and above) were happy if they managed to get to rank 10 in AT ladder if they teamup together. They simply suxed in game and got those ranks from abusing random shit like Roos, PapaSniper blob and such. In: Lobby
Thread: My opinion on the units post patch.21 Aug 2013, 20:33 PM Lonely sniper capping...Oorah with cons...sniper is dead or forced to retreat. I have tried to place a sniper to my 2v2 builds but it has no use and needs constant babysitting. Also with his 40hp he is easy target even for vanilla cons if they got lucky. Bleeding soviets by shooting cons one by one is also a joke it simply does not work. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: My opinion on the units post patch.21 Aug 2013, 19:53 PM Ost sniper is useless in early game cuz you have to sacrifice 360mp and also capping power since sniper cant stand his own ground. It is not so hard to calculate how many conscripts you have to snipe to get yr MP back. Generally if you ever face a sniper as Soviet all you have to do is go cap somewhere else cuz Ost player cant send him alone to force you to retreat. On the other hand soviet sniper needs only 2 shots to force any ost infantry to retreat. I am afraid Ost sniper has no use in his current state so he should get some new role/ability and sniping should be just a part of it. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Patch Notes 20/08/201321 Aug 2013, 18:51 PM Jump back to quoted post21 Aug 2013, 17:50 PMmariens in my opinion there should be 2v2 at and 2v2 random as 2 different game modes, maby u could choose what you wanna play when u with team mate vs teams for some challenge or vs random for some luls. at the moment when its mixed its not fun and in general skill level in team games is way lower couse of that, playing vs noobs all the time makes you play way worse then vs teams. atleast 2v2 needs to be separated, 3v3 and 4v4 can stay mixed Lets not forget that you have no idea if you play against friends or random guys so you play as good as you can and later you should not care if you owned friends or random guys or got owned by them. In SC2 for instance I and my friend got owned many times by random guys simply cuz they got better skill and our Teamspeak did not help us at all. So what I am trying to say here is that with good system joining together players with sort of the same skill level there still can be very good and "balanced" 2v2 games without seperate ladders. In: Lobby