Profile of ddd

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 528 | Subs: 1

General Information
Website: https://www.coh2.org/ladders/playercard/steamid/76561198058464077
Steam: 76561198058464077


Thread: I hear the new patches have made western allies op?7 Apr 2019, 16:26 PM USF so powerful in the late game after tech changes, too bad these changes didnt affect usf late game in any way other than making them able to survive till it comes. Suddenly pathfinders are OP even tho they are in their current state for years (or months, dont remember). Scott and jackson "breaking the balance" even tho usf saw minimal use in last team tournament with these units in their current state. And still if you watch any high level team game, what will you see? Soviet armored assault/mech support with brit buddy vs okw spec ops/overwatch with jager armor support from ost. This thread is loads of bs. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Why does ost puma require battle phase 2?7 Apr 2019, 16:02 PM Remove command p4, add call in puma back. Both in the same doc are broken. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Give 222 smoke by default?6 Apr 2019, 22:32 PM Stuart has smoke? Damn i missed patch again. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: BUG: Easy83 Apr 2019, 17:50 PM In its description it says its faster than standard sherman but its actualy slower than other sherman variants. In: COH2 Bugs
Thread: Heavy Tank Call-Ins3 Apr 2019, 17:06 PM Medium tech + current CP requirements. Its so easy to fix. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Jagdpanzer IV in Battlegroup2 Apr 2019, 18:45 PM Jump back to quoted post2 Apr 2019, 18:43 PMBalanced_Gamer I mean it sounds easy when you say but OKW has a huge set back which is not being able to build fuel and munitions caches. It has be placed to forward and aggressively, (not too far but good enough that you can support it) to protect vital points. If OKW could build caches, then I would consider more often placing it behind but I can not because I will put myself in a disadvantage. Usually protect cutting points or protecting fuel and ammo. That is what they have to always do. Many are forced to do so in order to progress in the game. Dont have caches (there is 223 tho which DOUBLES income from fuel point) but can salvage wrecks. In 1v1 you will rarely see anyone build caches and in team games you have ost player to do it. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Jagdpanzer IV in Battlegroup2 Apr 2019, 18:41 PM Jump back to quoted post2 Apr 2019, 18:37 PMLago Would it be a problem if it did? It's a casemate tank destroyer. It's not going to be zooming around the map hunting lights like a Puma or an AEC. You're setting yourself back if you throw down 135 FU on a medium counter if there are no mediums to counter. You still dont get it. You dont have to buy jp4 preemptivly. You can just spam light vehicles, much like any okw player using spec ops and then if enemy deploys medium tank you are just 135 FU short of counter. Much like spec ops but even cheaper and doesnt force you to pick doctrine. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Jagdpanzer IV in Battlegroup2 Apr 2019, 18:38 PM Jump back to quoted post2 Apr 2019, 18:35 PMBalanced_Gamer Jagdpanzer should not come any earlier than any other medium tank in game. It should be like a back up plan if you happen to lose the PanzerHQ, the only at least you will at building a tank is Jagdpanzer only. Sounds fair and square because of the fact that no other faction has to deploy their base putting it at risk. You dont have to put it at risk. You can deploy it in base sector. You will end up with by far best base defence across all factions. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Jagdpanzer IV in Battlegroup2 Apr 2019, 18:36 PM Jump back to quoted post2 Apr 2019, 18:32 PMLago Versus a single medium tank? Yes, two Pumas compare favourably to one JPIV if used intelligently. They can chase it down, smoke themselves, have decent turret rotation and can't be circlestrafed. I know puma is broken, you dont have to tell me that. Your "fix" to that problem is adding more broken stuff to okw tho... If you fixed the Jackson's turret forwards, replaced the M1 anti-tank gun with a Raketenwerfer clone and required both officers upgraded then it'd be a similar proposition. I will take raketen in t0 over m1 any day. Imagine all these luchs rushers getting their light tank rekt by a pair of creeping raks. As for jackson, you will drasticly improve its armor, fire rate and hp too? If yes then i welcome these changes. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Jagdpanzer IV in Battlegroup2 Apr 2019, 18:25 PM Jump back to quoted post2 Apr 2019, 18:20 PMLago Another two Pumas is cheaper than backteching for the JPIV. You count 2 pumas versus one medium tank destroyer, healing and access to new units. Yup, jp4 after 2 truck still seems broken as fuck. Maybe give jackson after 2 officers too? In: COH2 Gameplay