Profile of ShadowLinkX37

You should be more specific about what is bad about it. Is the requirements too high? Is the bonuses too low? Is it too spaced out for 5 levels of vet?

Do you fully mean the veterancy is bad? Or are you just questioning why they fall off like stones after 6-7 minutes?

CoH3 at E3

Invised a post for being offtopic

I got a good question, but it's subjective I suppose. I know a good chunk of unit stats, and I know how most things work, or should because this game is RNG based. After playing for a few years, I cannot really determine what separates the absolute top players from top 150. Sure there's better micro, faster reaction time, and things like that, but there isn't anything that pros do substantially better than those in top 150. The counters are there for both parties, and many of them know how to handle multiple engagements.

Top players like Luvnest, when you watch them play via twitch are very quick around the map and that's how they maintain their engagements. Other top players like yourself and VonIvan are rather casual checking around the map, but you still maintain dominance over your opponet. I simply conclude this as you knowing how to support your army very well and are very good at macro game. Keeping your resource use at optimal and taking the best engagements possible.

So my question is, where would top 150 players learn types of things such as this. How do you know when tactical blobbing is appropriate, instead of proglonged 1 on 1 engagements with infantry. Do you cease all capping with a squad when a nearby sqaud becomes enveloped in a 2v1? So you can turn it into a 2v2?

These are very detailed concepts that I almost never see talked about. It happens everygame, but I'm sure most people answer this question subconciously instead of ever talking about fine details such as this.

Invised multiple posts for being offtopic, excess flame and just generally unconsctructive.