It's fun to see people coming up with a "for all games against emplacements" strats. I really would like to believe what u guys are saying, but its necessary to notice: you usually have to spend like ~~200+ mun/1000+ mp/150+ fuel in units/abilities and 1/4 of the game just to beat well placed emplacements (eg.: 1 mortar + 1 bofors).
That is A LOT of gameplay!!!
Thinking of another game-changing mechanic like "Emplacements", currently, they only show up around 8 - 10 minutes of the game, IF the player rush for them. (eg.: T-70/Ostwind/Luchs/AA HT/AEC) And that means denying other stuff to achieve the rush, for the desired gameplay benefit. And they can be easily countered in 1-2 minutes. Thinking of emplacement, how many time the enemy player need to counter it effectively? We should consider it. (BOFORS - in 5 min UKF can build it)
Of course: Not taking in consideration the commander brit went for (which scales the time needed to counter it considerably)
The emplacement idea is Ok in a certain view. But currently its mechanic is not well faceted, IMHO.
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.44965.874+13
- 2.706112.863+1
- 3.349180.660+4
- 4.332127.723+1
- 5.379204.650+1
- 6.970420.698+1
- 7.323143.693-1
- 8.854232.786+1
- 9.468300.609+2
- 10.325117.735+2
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
