It's fun to see people coming up with a "for all games against emplacements" strats. I really would like to believe what u guys are saying, but its necessary to notice: you usually have to spend like ~~200+ mun/1000+ mp/150+ fuel in units/abilities and 1/4 of the game just to beat well placed emplacements (eg.: 1 mortar + 1 bofors).
That is A LOT of gameplay!!!
Thinking of another game-changing mechanic like "Emplacements", currently, they only show up around 8 - 10 minutes of the game, IF the player rush for them. (eg.: T-70/Ostwind/Luchs/AA HT/AEC) And that means denying other stuff to achieve the rush, for the desired gameplay benefit. And they can be easily countered in 1-2 minutes. Thinking of emplacement, how many time the enemy player need to counter it effectively? We should consider it. (BOFORS - in 5 min UKF can build it)
Of course: Not taking in consideration the commander brit went for (which scales the time needed to counter it considerably)
The emplacement idea is Ok in a certain view. But currently its mechanic is not well faceted, IMHO.
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.46467.874+6
- 2.794136.854-1
- 3.14465.689-1
- 4.21154.796+4
- 5.400212.654+2
- 6.353186.655+2
- 7.501325.607+4
- 8.298128.700-1
- 9.327117.736+4
- 10.857232.787+4
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
