Profile of whitesky00

Jump back to quoted post23 Feb 2016, 23:04 PMRedDevilCG

Yeah if you want actual damage, you don't want to suppress quickly because suppression basically neuters damage done to the suppressed squad. But if you're not looking for the suppression then why use an MG really?

Jump back to quoted post23 Feb 2016, 18:29 PMMyself

Auto attack need vision on target barrage does not...

If barrage becomes significantly better than auto attack teams that have mini map intelligence will have a vast advantage over team with out...

On the other hand, if i remember correctly
Wer mortar has better auto fire than barrage
SO mortar has better barrage then autofire
OKW has better autofire than barrage
USF has better barrage than autofire
UKf mortar has better autofire than barrage...

Imo thing are fine...

Jump back to quoted post22 Feb 2016, 22:01 PMIntelligence209

its the FRP that also makes riflemen>grens

ability to remain on the front line over grens.

Remove FRP, or change how the weapon racks work with the squads...

terminator infantry with nearly every advantage possible..

Jump back to quoted post22 Feb 2016, 17:54 PMJespe

That section is amazing if enemy pushes 222 or luchs... It seem to wipe grenadier squads too at ease...

Idk if i am insane or something but i think Piat is O-kayish... Only problem i have with them is luchs and against those i usually have boys infantry sections (if i was not fast enought to have aec) The heavier the enemy tank the better piat seems to be.

I understand that with snare like Soviet/OST have IS with double piat could murder any vehicle (okay not KT or tiger) alone after snaring it. They would just walk to it and shoot it point blank to death..

Jump back to quoted post22 Feb 2016, 17:19 PMJaedrik

So what you're saying is...

Brits need homing PIATs

Edit: OOH OHH OR JUST ANTI-TANK INFANTRY SECTIONS DEFAULT AVAILABLE