Profile of Nabarxos

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 392

General Information


Thread: Ostheer sniper HP nerf13 Sep 2015, 21:01 PM the werhmacht sniper SHUTS DOWN THE BRITISH anyone who defends them should play 1vs1 or 2vs2 with the brits and THEN form their opinion on the matter In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Enough about the brits SU-76 STILL OP FOR COST13 Sep 2015, 10:53 AM Jump back to quoted post12 Sep 2015, 09:26 AMAerohank I agree. The SU76 needs a penetration nerf so it has a harder time penetrating heavy tanks. penetration nerf? is this some kind of a joke? really now whats the problem facing those SU-76s? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ostheer sniper HP nerf13 Sep 2015, 09:32 AM Jump back to quoted post13 Sep 2015, 09:21 AMnewvan Two 82hp models for SU with higher price, like 400 - 420 mp and 100-120 for model, with insane durability and mediocre fire power could be interesting, but it will be very hard to balance them, in other way with higher price it will be harder to build couple of them. Current position of SU sniper is fine. why increase the price of the soviet sniper if they buff their hitpoints? the german one didnt received one also if you lose one man you pay 90mp to replace him with another so whats the point costing 400 mp? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: LeIG is too effective12 Sep 2015, 21:16 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Sep 2015, 19:05 PMAce of Swords +1 to this, I think Emplacements shouldn't be killed by arty (on or off map) but they should be vulnerable if unsupported against direct fire sources, such as tanks, panzershreks and flamethrowers (but not flame arty and other stuff like that). they should be weak to AT fire,flame damage and heavy art,BUT NOT PANZERSHREACKS the last thing i want to see is more panzershreack blobs In: COH2 Balance
Thread: How to solve the AFK problem:12 Sep 2015, 21:08 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Sep 2015, 19:12 PMadamírcz Sure, but sitting on the spot where you left them and not moving will really help them, right? Especially in the artilerry phase of the match when you are not safe even in your base. I play with buddies sometimes and i also don't feel like "oh, my life is lost and wasted" when i meet an AFK, but why should we deal with something that CAN be fixed? if someone doesnt have the will to fight on dont punish him In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Should the USF AT gun recieve a buff?12 Sep 2015, 17:28 PM so many people say the 57mm AT gun is ok lets see why they think so.. "it fires faster then any other AT gun" worse penetration from all at guns so good luck with penetration "it has an insane vet 1 ability that self spots" and what will you use that for?as said its penetration is awful "its cheap make more of them" still wont do a thing awful penetration and will take more pop cap "it doesnt need a buff" the reason behind this statement?cause of its RoF? its AP shells are aslo bad (doesnt even increase penetration to ZIS-3 level and also cost munition and has a cooldown) In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: How to solve the AFK problem:12 Sep 2015, 15:46 PM sorry mate but if you hate AFKERS play with a buddy 2vs2 or alone 1vs1 If you want 3vs3 pr 4vs4(where leavers are very common) then just deal with it In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Enough about the brits SU-76 STILL OP FOR COST12 Sep 2015, 06:15 AM this again?? k mate should i tell you ways to hard counter it in 1vs1 or the soft ways to counter it??? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: LeIG is too effective11 Sep 2015, 21:05 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Sep 2015, 21:00 PMDraje I never said the manpower was little, i just mentioned it. The cost buff was actually amazing, ~22% decrease. I mentioned it combined with the recent ninja change to its aoe. Overall its better than it was before, but the changes its had aren't enough to warrant the recent reactions. The gun is accurate with high kill rate to close units, but has poor total aoe. It functions as an assault gun. Honestly, I think the best option would be to rework its vet, and nerf its vet 0 capabilities. OKW functions as an army with a premium on basically every unit, due to the fact everything has 2 levels extra on vet. The Le.iG functions barely any better until vet 5, and even then while the numbers are good its aoe is still shit so it doesn't really do that much. It functions super well at vet 0 and at vet 5 it feels insignificantly better. If people want it nerfed its vet needs rework, because currently its an assault gun with the vet of a mortar i am ok with it getting a decent vet bonuses but nerfing its vet 0 power honestly and agree with it In: COH2 Balance
Thread: LeIG is too effective11 Sep 2015, 20:07 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Sep 2015, 19:11 PMDraje What is this, before it was a horrifically cost inefficient unit. Now after it's manpower cost reduction, it's opieOp? The minor aoe change reduced it's overall radius (giving it less suppression capabilities) with a minor increase in killing radius, that's all Wtf are with these over exaggerations? The pack howie kills twice as ell as this unit does and it's totally fine wait mate did you just said the Pak Howitzer is better then the ISG? you sure its better?? the Pack Howtzer is AWFUL in every turn,its scatter(or accuracy)is sooo bad that it barely makes itself useful and its durability is also awful(loses 4 men and the rest 2 leave the gun)its price is still unacceptable for the USF "the little price decrease suddly made it better? stop whining" little price decrease?? are you serious? and it also received supression buff,couple that with its ability to shut down infantry attacks to shut it down makes this unit stupid OP "but before it was ok" before not many people used it BUT now that the british have landed and their defencive nature this unit suddly gained SO MUCH VALUE for its mp that it simply overperforms its and shuts down a faction easily,and should the OKW get the chance to bring 2 into the game the british are killed on the otherhand the soviets barely notice it(too busy killing axis with quads)and the americans barely find it difficult to beat(an m20 or stuart put it to rest esily) BUT the british cant do a thing other then rush a cromwell,they also cant suffer loses AT ALL,do you know how manpower starved the faction is??? "so its does its role so whats the problem" true it does BUT its too cheap for such performance and for that needs a simple price increase to 430mp(remember it outpeforms the Pack Howitzer) In: COH2 Balance