Profile of F1sh

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 521

General Information
Register Time: 5 Jul 2015, 21:09 PM


Thread: British Patch 3 Sep27 Aug 2015, 11:47 AM SU-76 and Quad still need nerfs. SU-76 should not have the same penetration as SU-85, at the same time as being much more mobile and having a barrage ability. Quad still does too much damage. It can suppress, reinforce, shoot down planes, and kill most light vehicles already. Its damage should be lowered. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: USF needs24 Aug 2015, 10:48 AM Jump back to quoted post24 Aug 2015, 07:57 AMUS3K I really hate the whole "USF doesn't need heavy because faction design" argument. Look at Ost as it stands now. Ost has access to everything. Decent inf, decent at gun, decent support weapons, medium armour, heavy-medium armour, and heavy armour. Soviets are pretty similar but with different strengths and weaknesses. This isn't because they don't have certain units - they have everything - but because their units perform differently. You don't look at Ost and say "Ost shouldn't have grens, as they aren't meant to have early game offensive power" or "Ost shouldn't have p4 as versatile medium armour is reserved for USF." All factions need access to the same tools, but with factional differences reflected in how the tools work - look at maxim vs mg42 as an example. I don't think USF needs a heavy to be balanced, but in the same way as axis don't need a heavy every match to win. Sometimes though they are necessary, and its always good to have the option. Also a heavy tank is the very definition of mobile, versatile power. It sure as hell isn't static and sure isn't weak. +10000 In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: UKF - Know your commanders23 Aug 2015, 21:47 PM eh lolwut nothing 2 see here In: Lobby
Thread: USF needs23 Aug 2015, 19:38 PM Jump back to quoted post23 Aug 2015, 19:33 PMMr. Someguy It would be preferable to make the Sherman scale better. A Heavy Tank won't fix shit, all it'll do is make people want to rush for the Heavy Tank. All you would have done is broken the faction even more. How about an upgrade to get a better gun with higher penetration for the Sherman, but it loses the ability to use HE shells? Not as good as the Easy Eight's gun, though. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: USF needs23 Aug 2015, 17:21 PM I agree with everything. I like the idea of a supply yard like in CoH1. USF needs a stock Pershing, though. We have enough Sherman variants. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: this game is fucked for axis23 Aug 2015, 00:08 AM I main allies, and I do think AA Halftrack does way too much damage and SU-76 has too high penetration and its barrage should cost munitions. Though OP's post makes zero sense. In: Strategy Desk
Thread: Sega announces free trial for CoH2: The British Forces22 Aug 2015, 12:04 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Aug 2015, 11:35 AMJaridan well you can already pre-download it, if you so desire. How? In: Lobby
Thread: USF and potential suggestions for its Design22 Aug 2015, 11:13 AM I posted this in another thread, but here goes: HQ: Riflemen, Rear Echelon, Ambulance, M26 Pershing (after all tiers unlocked) Lieutenant (25 fuel): HMG, Mortar (or pak howitzer), M20 Utility Car Captain (70 fuel): Stuart, AA Halftrack, AT gun. Major stays the same, but Shermans can upgrade to a slightly better gun with more penetration, but lose ability to use HE shells. I made Lieutenant so cheap so you can actually get support weapons early on, no more waiting 5 minutes until your first HMG. And this way, you can get Lieutenant and Captain. And I want Rear Echelons to be able to place mines. No faction should be without mines. In: Lobby
Thread: Sega announces free trial for CoH2: The British Forces22 Aug 2015, 10:37 AM Huh. If Relic gave in to our complaining in 2 days, maybe they will fix USF too. In: Lobby
Thread: Relic says: Something BIG after the brits...21 Aug 2015, 22:47 PM Jump back to quoted post20 Aug 2015, 19:03 PMRPhilMan1 If they add in the UKF logo, it happens to be right over the UK... What is that? I'm pretty new to CoH2. In: Lobby