Profile of tightrope

Avatar Area

Offline New Zealand
Posts: 1194 | Subs: 29

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/tightropexilo
Twitter: https://twitter.com/tightropegaming
Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/tightropegaming
Steam: 76561197969981459
Residence:

New Zealand
Nationality:

New Zealand
Game Name: Harvey Birdman, Attorney At Law

Show Latest Posts


Thread: Good Game vs sov T16 Aug 2016, 07:46 AM Played live on stream, people said I should upload it. I had some bad timing on a few of my pushes. Really close match. In: Replays
Thread: M42 AT gun, brainstorm and solutions6 Aug 2016, 01:18 AM I would like it to have a much wider arc of fire like the USF anti tank gun. As it stands it has a good rate of fire but small arc so vehicles rarely get hit more than twice before leaving. On anti tank guns that do 160 damage that isn't a big issue but it is here. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Lenny123465 Aug 2016, 21:10 PM He is back! In: Fan Clubs
Thread: tightrope Shoutcasts5 Aug 2016, 03:58 AM It's a hard life as OKW In: COH2 Shoutcasts
Thread: Advanced British Trench Facilities4 Aug 2016, 01:04 AM I'm undecided whether they should allow them to be stolen. Making them easier to kill with AT-guns would be good. Perhaps they should only be build-able in connected territory. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: tightrope Shoutcasts3 Aug 2016, 00:15 AM I cast this a while back, some top players in 2v2 In: COH2 Shoutcasts
Thread: Let's Talk: Sd.Kfz. 2222 Aug 2016, 03:01 AM It is a shame that 2 x 222 is almost mandatory. That 30 fuel counters 60+ I agree that no tech call ins are messing up timings across the board. Getting a light vehicle followed up by a call-in is just so damn effective at the moment. Maybe once that is fixed there can be a proper look at teching to get mediums which is a rare sight these days. The m20 and m3a1 have almost no window of opportunity vs the 222. The m20 costs way more manpower, needs a munitions upgrade for skirts and then takes way more experience to vet up. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: New Relic Tourney: War Paint Championship Series1 Aug 2016, 10:27 AM Jump back to quoted post1 Aug 2016, 09:53 AMStormless The money from War Paint sales goes back to the community. So people who make the content (skins etc) get a percentage of sales and then the rest goes into the organisation i.e paying for a studio to cast from and prizes for the participants. The default milestones are created from these original sales and that's why the tournament has been announced. I know how it works. 20% from the Warpaint sales is supposed to be put towards competition prize pools. $850 prize pool would mean they had only sold $4250 of Warpaint skins which is obviously not true. So I'm just wondering if the other sales were used to recover what they spent on ESL. I think it even mentions that in the polycount competition. In: Lobby
Thread: New Relic Tourney: War Paint Championship Series1 Aug 2016, 00:19 AM So what happened to all the money from the warpaint winners before this tournament was announced? Did they just pocket that to cover the ESL costs? That is what it seems like to me. As Ami said people should be able to see the prize pool increase with no limits rather than being hidden behind these milestones. In: Lobby
Thread: Pershing buff?1 Aug 2016, 00:13 AM If it gets more health then you would need to nerf it in other areas like removing the double tap, reducing aoe, reducing reload buffs with vet etc. In: COH2 Gameplay