Profile of Looney

This is dumb. 2 the M1919 and the MG 42 have nearly identical DPS. 4 doesn't apply to Allied weapon racks, so why to Axis? 5 and 6 have nothing to do with weapon racks.

"nearly" indeed.

5 and 6 have alot to do with why allies have racks and axis don't if you think about it.

Ost doesn't need to pay or vet up for there abilities, while USF and Brits do, Brits don't have a snare weapon on there base squads, USF only when vet 1. Not to mention they need to pay for there nade unlocks.

That's why I'm explaining why it would be a bad idea for ost to have weapon racks, because when you mirror it, you'll have to pay for everything including all your upgrades which would give even higher tech costs to ostheer. Or you expect to just give ost weapon racks without a single downside? That'll mean you need to buff USF weapon unlocks and grenade unlocks for free to mirror it to ost.

How can you not understand why mines don't have anything to do with weapon racks, USF doesn't have non doc mines, so it has a weapon racks for zooks. Brits don't have a non doc snare, so they have weapon racks with piats.
I feel like you're not understanding me when i tell you it'll mean ostheer will get a huge early game nerf when you give them racks.

The main word is "Vetted" this shit is dying too fast and it is hard to handle it to late game.

I wish all units were mediocre until they got vetted. Imo the AT gun is fine. You just have to set it up behind your army, when it's vet 1 and you can purchase it's longer range it's one of the best AT guns imo.

Though whenever the werfer/stuka arrives you can only watch your precious vet be stolen away.

One of the best at guns in the game when vetted, it's fine.

The m36 Jackson, because it has zero AI and great AT, just like the unit should be.