Profile of Alexzandvar

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1

General Information
Steam: 76561198026003886


Thread: Relic should rely less on community balance advices17 Jul 2015, 01:10 AM Jump back to quoted post17 Jul 2015, 01:09 AMMLad I am not going to whine about balance, but I do think that Relics should first think about improving allies playerbase Which is why they are releasing a new Allied faction In: Lobby
Thread: Epic 2v2 Match with Rollo KRUPP STEEL17 Jul 2015, 00:07 AM Won with less than 10 points! The enemy simply couldn't stand up to our superior armor and troops. In: Replays
Thread: Update on beta patch by Jason Lee16 Jul 2015, 20:38 PM Jump back to quoted post16 Jul 2015, 20:29 PMvan Voort I am incredibly ambivalent about this, as I long since stopped regarding balance discussions as worthwhile on any level other than soap opera If Relic actually start listening to community suggestions they need to be careful that doesn't turn into "appease who cries the loudest" or the special pleading, whining and fanboyism will be become intolerable Most the changes are all common sense ones and balance is not a irrecoverable thing. If something is changed and the change is bad Relic can listen to fix it. I don't see how shitposters should ruin discussions for everyone else. In: Lobby
Thread: Update on beta patch by Jason Lee16 Jul 2015, 18:46 PM Jump back to quoted post16 Jul 2015, 18:27 PMkamk Why would it hit the field before the 222? SOV: tech 80 & M5 30 (+120 ammo) OST: tech 40+20 & 222 20 fuel (no ammo) Am i missing something? M15 AA is the USF AA HT not the Soviet one. In: Lobby
Thread: Tuning Pack OKW P416 Jul 2015, 07:20 AM Jump back to quoted post16 Jul 2015, 07:03 AMIron Emperor Firesparks, what would you suggest as popcap raise? Iv suggested this before; lower the fuel cost of all OKW tanks by 33% but raise the MP cost by 50% and increase the pop cap by 3-4 for each tank so you can get tanks actually out the door but replacing them is a challenge. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Im not saying Germans are OP, but....16 Jul 2015, 05:31 AM Jump back to quoted post16 Jul 2015, 04:17 AMBeefSurge Germans aren't really OP, OP. Ostheer is very easy compared to USF and OKW, but so are Soviets. That's because Ostheer is designed like an actual human made it instead of some horrible chaos demon bent of destroying your soul via gimmicks. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Tuning Pack OKW P416 Jul 2015, 05:23 AM Jump back to quoted post16 Jul 2015, 05:05 AMcomm_ash Fuel penalty has nothing to do with it. The fuel penalty is compensated for by giving you a stock heavy, vet 5 on all units, and extremely efficient teching (ie. Bonuses on buildings). Im not quite sure what you are saying? OKW wasn't very well thought out when it was designed. A faction should have a logical progress of power upwards, not a "weak most of the game then HOLY SHIT AHHHHHHHHHHH". The best thing about the new PIV is it makes OKW midgame a loooooot more tolerable. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Tuning Pack OKW P416 Jul 2015, 05:00 AM Jump back to quoted post16 Jul 2015, 04:58 AMcomm_ash I am seeing a lot of people wanting a fu cost decrease, citing okw resource penalties. But that's always been the way okw has worked. They can get initial armor out fast enough, but have a hard time replacing it. And it's not like you don't get bonuses for that minus, you have access to vet 5 so that your infantry and vehicles scale much better into the lategame than your enemies' units. You pay 135 fu for the best stock medium in the game (230 frontal armor). If you pay less, then the unit itself has to be weaker. If okw fu units get a cost decrease, then there would be no point in having a fuel penalty. Panthers cost the same for both okw and ostheer, as does the puma. This proves that equal fu cost for equal performance is how it works. Most people (me included) are fine with the price. But it being the best stock medium armor wise doesn't make the fuel penalty not exist. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Tuning Pack OKW P416 Jul 2015, 04:35 AM Jump back to quoted post16 Jul 2015, 03:59 AMLucas Troy You're missing the main point which is that with equal map control OKW will have around 75% of their opponent's fuel income, not 66%. The base income cannot be discounted as it a significant portion of the fuel each faction receives. If you think I'm wrong, show me a screen shot of a replay where an OKW player is getting 66% of the fuel their Wehrmacht ally is getting. You won't be able to because that situation basically never occurs in the actual game. The game doesn't do fractions so here is how income works. You get 66% of a fuel point which is isn't a round number meaning the game just shows you getting (rounded) up more fuel than you should actually be getting. If you turn conversion on yes you can negate part of the income disability at the cost of decreasing your other income (it isn't very efficient). In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Conscripts need mid-game buff16 Jul 2015, 04:32 AM Jump back to quoted post16 Jul 2015, 04:10 AMBeefSurge Going by this logic Riflemen and Grens are blobby and silly? Yes In: COH2 Gameplay