Profile of TheSleep3r

Jump back to quoted post24 Nov 2015, 07:39 AMRMMLz

If this game had a tiny shred of reality, it's gone now. Man just look at those name. Firs Firestorm "DOCTRINE" and now flaming arrow "COMPANY"? What the hell.

Jump back to quoted post22 Nov 2015, 19:22 PM__deleted__

Please dont give shreck to sturmpios.

They are not meant to be panzershreck squad.

They will need to place mines , fight off ifnantry , tanks , reapir tanks and clear field defences in 1 unit ?

This can lead into 1 think - blobing.

Also it would be indirect nerf to some doctrines (feuersturm) becuase they wont allow flametrower + shreck on one squad whitch woul mean even more Spios you need.

Also no one would build voks , it will be Spio spam + psuhing kubel.

And to add on this they will vet like crazy with shreck.


Please no skreck on them , there are like milion reason why not shreck on mid range assault rifle engineer

Jump back to quoted post12 Nov 2015, 15:04 PMpR1sm

my understanding of asymmetrical balancing would be two armies a,b with one having a unit that costs 300 that wins exactly against the 3 units of the other army costing 300 in total. thats asymmetrical balance to me. not one of the 3 units costing 100 beating the unit for 300 which is allegedly justfied because Army A gets a good counter to that in late game.

i dont want both units to cost the same while having the same performance i want the more expensive one to counter a unit that is cheaper and it is supposed to counter, is that really so hard to understand?

Jump back to quoted post10 Nov 2015, 12:59 PMhedfunk

I'm glad as a Soviet I can place one of my base buildings that has a massive gun that insta pins and annihilates infantry, rapes light vehicles and damages tanks on top of strategic point creating huge area of denial.

Or is that just OKW?